Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem

被引：110

作者：

Bacchetti, P ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA

来源：

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2002年 / 324卷 / 7348期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：1271 / 1273

页数：3

共 20 条

[1]

ALBERTS BM, 2001, RECOMMENDATIONS CHAN

[2]

Altman DG, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2661, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO

[3]

2-B

[4]

[Anonymous], 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P197

[5] What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? [J].

Black, N ;

van Rooyen, S ;

Godlee, F ;

Smith, R ;

Evans, S .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :231-233

[6] The importance of reviewers [J].

Bloom, FE .

SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5403) :789-789

[7] Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts [J].

Callaham, ML ;

Baxt, WG ;

Waeckerie, JF ;

Wears, RL .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :229-231

[8]

Gleick James, 1999, FASTER ACCELERATION

[9] Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial [J].

Godlee, F ;

Gale, CR ;

Martyn, CN .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :237-240

[10]

Goldbeck-Wood S, 1999, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V318, P44

← 1 2 →