Effect of solid-liquid separation on bod and VFA in swine manure

被引:23
作者
Zhu, J [1 ]
Ndegwa, PM [1 ]
Luo, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, So Res & Outreach Ctr, Waseca, MN 56093 USA
关键词
separation; swine manure; odor control; particle size; volatile fatty acids;
D O I
10.1080/09593332208618209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fresh swine manure was sieved into seven different particle size categories, i.e., <0.075 mm, <0.15 mm, <0.25 mm, <0.5 mm, <1.0 mm, <1.4 mm, and <2.0 mm. Manure was stored in seven PVC columns and sampled every 5 days up to 30 days. Manure samples were analyzed for total volatile fatty acids (VFAs), 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total solids (TS), total suspended solids (TSS), and total volatile solids (TVS). Two parameters (VFAs and BOD5) were used to determine the odor generation potential of the test manure. The results showed that total VFAs correlated well with BOD5 (R-2=0.8297). The levels of TSS only explained 40% of BOD5 and 46% of VFAs, both of which increased with storage time, regardless of solid particle sizes. Also, the data inferred that most of the odorous compounds (measured by VFA and BOD levels) were contained in manure solid particles less than 0.075 mm. These cannot be removed by commercial mechanical separators with screen size ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 mm. With an average separation efficiency of 25% for most commercially available mechanical separators, the removal efficiencies of BOD5 and VFAs were as low as 10% and 12%, respectively. These findings cannot justify the use of solid-liquid separation to control odor. Data also showed that for swine manure, it is critical to run separation treatment within the first ten days after the manure is excreted to potentially improve the separation efficiency. After ten days, the degradation of TSS was accelerated due to the increased biological activities, which may greatly reduce the separation efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1243
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA, V20th
[2]  
BARTH CL, 1974, T ASAE, V17, P737, DOI 10.13031/2013.36950
[3]  
BARTH CL, 1974, T ASAE, V17, P742, DOI 10.13031/2013.36951
[4]   CHARACTERISTICS OF SLURRY FROM FATTENING PIGS, AND COMPARISON WITH SLURRY FROM LAYING HENS [J].
EVANS, MR ;
HISSETT, R ;
SMITH, MPW ;
ELLAM, DF .
AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 1978, 4 (01) :77-83
[5]  
KROODSMA W, 1985, ODOR PREVENTION CONT, P213
[6]   SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF AIR IN PIG HOUSES [J].
LUNN, F ;
VANDEVYVER, J .
AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 1977, 3 (2-3) :159-169
[7]  
Merkel J, 1969, T AM SOC AGR ENG, V12, P310, DOI [10.13031/2013.38828, DOI 10.13031/2013.38828]
[8]   Changes in hog manure in a flow-through anaerobic storage tank [J].
Oleszkiewicz, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 21 (05) :597-600
[9]   ODOR AND AMMONIA EMISSIONS FOLLOWING THE SPREADING OF AEROBICALLY-TREATED PIG SLURRY ON GRASSLAND [J].
PAIN, BF ;
PHILLIPS, VR ;
CLARKSON, CR ;
MISSELBROOK, TH ;
REES, YJ ;
FARRENT, JW .
BIOLOGICAL WASTES, 1990, 34 (02) :149-160
[10]  
Riskowski G. L., 1991, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, V7, P248