A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals

被引:350
作者
Parvez, S
Venkataraman, C
Mukherji, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Environm Sci & Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
bioluminescence; Vibrio fischeri; luciferase; solid phase test; kinetic assay;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2005.08.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evaluation of biological effects using a rapid, sensitive and cost effective method can indicate specific information on toxicity/ecotoxicity. Since assays based on animals, plants and algae are expensive, time consuming and require large sample volume, recent studies have emphasized the benefits of rapid, reproducible and cost effective bacterial assays for toxicity screening and assessment. This review focuses on a bacterial assay, i.e., Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay, which is often chosen as the first test in a test battery based on speed and cost consideration. The test protocol is simple and was originally applied for aqueous phase samples or extracts. The versatility of the assay has increased with subsequent modification, i.e., the kinetic assay for turbid and colored samples and the solid phase test for analyzing sediment toxicity. Researchers have reported the Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence assay as the most sensitive across a wide range of chemicals compared to other bacterial assays such as nitrification inhibition, respirometry, ATP luminescence and enzyme inhibition. This assay shows good correlations with other standard acute toxicity assays and is reported to detect toxicity across a wide spectrum of toxicants. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 268
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Optimisation of a microbial bioassay for contaminated soil monitoring:: bacterial inoculum standardisation and comparison with Microtox® assay [J].
Abbondanzi, F ;
Cachada, A ;
Campisi, T ;
Guerra, R ;
Raccagni, M ;
Iacondini, A .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2003, 53 (08) :889-897
[2]   Toxicity assessment of xenobiotic contaminated groundwater using lux modified Pseudomonas fluorescens [J].
Boyd, EM ;
Killham, K ;
Wright, J ;
Rumford, S ;
Hetheridge, M ;
Cumming, R ;
Meharg, AA .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1997, 35 (09) :1967-1985
[3]   Assessing the quality of marine coastal environments:: comparison of scope for growth and Microtox®, bioassay results of pollution gradient areas in eastern Mediterranean (Greece) [J].
Cotou, E ;
Papathanassiou, E ;
Tsangaris, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 119 (02) :141-149
[4]   A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge [J].
Dalzell, DJB ;
Alte, S ;
Aspichueta, E ;
de la Sota, A ;
Etxebarria, J ;
Gutierrez, M ;
Hoffmann, CC ;
Sales, D ;
Obst, U ;
Christofi, N .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 47 (05) :535-545
[5]  
DAVERE M, 1994, CHEMOSPHERE, V28, P261
[6]   THE MICROTOX AS AN ALTERNATIVE ASSAY IN THE ACUTE TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER POLLUTANTS [J].
DEZWART, D ;
SLOOFF, W .
AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 1983, 4 (02) :129-138
[7]   Measurement of short- and long-term toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using luminescent bacteria [J].
El-Alawi, YS ;
McConkey, BJ ;
Dixon, DG ;
Greenberg, BM .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2002, 51 (01) :12-21
[8]   Toxicity testing of wastewater and sewage sludge by biosensors, bioassays and chemical analysis [J].
Farré, M ;
Barceló, D .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 22 (05) :299-310
[9]   Ecotoxicological and chemical evaluation of phenolic compounds in industrial effluents [J].
Guerra, R .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2001, 44 (08) :1737-1747
[10]  
Harkey GA, 2000, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V19, P276, DOI [10.1002/etc.5620190205, 10.1897/1551-5028(2000)019&lt