Application of the integrated framework for the plant layout evaluation problem

被引:26
作者
Lin, LC
Sharp, GP
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Natl Kaohsiung 1st Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Transportat Warehousing & Logist, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
关键词
facility layout; facility planning; layout evaluation; plant layout; multi-criterion evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00174-X
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
During the past two decades, there was not enough research effort spent to study the plant layout evaluation problem compared with that in the plant layout design problem. Only lengthy criterion sets with little structure were proposed for evaluation purpose. Very few quantitative indices were developed for measuring the impacts resulting from the criteria. In addition, there was no reasonable mechanism available to integrate the criteria and indices to obtain a score for each layout alternative. Therefore, an integrated framework for the plant layout evaluation problem is proposed to overcome these three drawbacks. This framework includes a structured criterion set having 18 criteria represented by a three-level hierarchical structure, the corresponding quantitative and qualitative indices for the criteria, and the integration methodology. This paper presents the integration methodology. Six essential issues in developing the integration methodology are discussed (i.e., user flexibility, method of weight assignment, normalization of index values, preceding direction of integration process, insensitivity to intermediate changes, data deficiency and information imbalance). The characteristics of criteria and indices are utilized to reduce the integration effort. For example, the efforts spent in pairwise comparisons of criteria and alternative-criterion comparisons usually seen in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are greatly reduced. The application of the integrated framework to two industrial cases including an electronic equipment manufacturer and a home furnishing manufacturer demonstrates the applicability of the research results. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 138
页数:21
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[2]  
BEASLEY A, 1994, 4105 ISYE GEORG I TE
[3]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[4]  
BROWN CH, 1972, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V4, P1
[5]   A FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD FOR FACILITY SITE SELECTION [J].
LIANG, GS ;
WANG, MJJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (11) :2313-2330
[6]  
LIN LC, 1995, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
[7]  
LIN LC, 1996, STRUCTURED CRITERION
[8]   AMBIGUOUS CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN AHP - CONSEQUENCES AND SOLUTIONS [J].
SCHONER, B ;
WEDLEY, WC .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1989, 20 (03) :462-475