Factors associated with participation in breast cancer treatment clinical trials

被引:115
作者
Avis, NE
Smith, KW
Link, CL
Hortobagyi, GN
Rivera, E
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Sect Social Sci & Hlth Policy, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] RTI Int, Waltham, MA USA
[3] New England Res Inst, Watertown, MA 02172 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8976
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose It is well established that recruitment to clinical trials (CTs) is difficult and time consuming. This article reports on factors related to CT participation among women who were invited to participate in a CT for breast cancer. Patients and Methods Breast cancer patients who were eligible for a CT were identified by 16 different cancer centers. After their invitation to participate in a trial, patients who were undecided about participation in a I were recruited into the present study at that time. After a patient made a decision about trial participation, a telephone interview was conducted to assess knowledge of CTs, perceived benefits and drawbacks of CTs, and personal factors affecting the women's decision regarding participation. Results A total of 208 patients participated in the study. Fifty-eight percent of the patients decided to participate in a trial. Logistic regression analyses showed that the factors best explaining participation were trial phase, perceived drawbacks, time and travel considerations, therapeutic benefit of trial, and physician recommendation. Participation rates were similar for both phase I and phase III trials. However, a higher percentage of women recruited to phase II trials accepted. Conclusion This study suggests that reducing drawbacks of CT participation, particularly travel time, and improving physician communication of trials are needed to increase trial participation.
引用
收藏
页码:1860 / 1867
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Understanding patient decisions about clinical trials and the associated communication process: A preliminary report [J].
Albrecht, TL ;
Penner, LA ;
Ruckdeschel, JC .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2003, 18 (04) :210-214
[2]   Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials [J].
Albrecht, TL ;
Ruckdeschel, JC ;
Riddle, DL ;
Blanchard, CG ;
Penner, LA ;
Coovert, MD ;
Quinn, G .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (01) :39-42
[3]   IS CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR KNOWLEDGE SUFFICIENT TO INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR [J].
AVIS, NE ;
MCKINLAY, JB ;
SMITH, KW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 6 (03) :137-144
[4]  
BAROFSKY I, 1979, CANCER CLIN TRIALS, V2, P237
[5]   HEALTH PROMOTION AND THE KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDE BEHAVIOR CONTINUUM [J].
BETTINGHAUS, EP .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :475-491
[6]   ATTITUDES TOWARD CLINICAL-TRIALS AMONG PATIENTS AND THE PUBLIC [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
LUSK, EJ ;
MILLER, DS ;
HURWITZ, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (08) :968-970
[7]   Why patients don't take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature [J].
Cox, K ;
McGarry, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2003, 12 (02) :114-122
[8]  
CUNNY KA, 1994, CLIN THER, V16, P273
[9]  
Davis S W, 1993, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P139
[10]   Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet [J].
Ellis, PM ;
Butow, PN ;
Tattersall, MHN .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) :1414-1423