Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the neck disability index and neck pain and disability scale

被引:189
作者
Cook, Chad
Richardson, Jan K.
Braga, Larissa
Menezes, Andreia
Soler, Xavier
Kume, Paulo
Zaninelli, Marcelo
Socolows, Fernanda
Pietrobon, Ricardo
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Phys Therapy, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Ctr Excellence Surg Outcomes, Div Orthoaed Surg, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Neck Disability Index; Neck Pain and Disability Scale; SF-36; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000221989.53069.16
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This study's design was a cross-cultural validation of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Objectives. This study's objective was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-BR) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS-BR). Summary of Background Data. Although several valid measures exist for measurement of neck pain and functional impairment, these measures have yet been validated in Brazilian Portuguese. Successful linguistic and cultural translation may allow appropriate cross-cultural comparison for clinical and laboratory research analysis. Methods. The NDI-BR and NPAD-BR were culturally and linguistically translated from English into Brazilian Portuguese. The translated version of the instrument was administered to 203 patients at a midsize hospital in southern Brazil. Psychometric evaluation included factor analysis, internal reliability measures, test-retest reliability at 1 and 7 days, and criterion validity comparison with the Brazilian version of the SF-36. Results. Factor analyses demonstrated a single-factor subscale for the NDI-BR and three subscales for the NPDS-BR. An item analysis showed a high degree of internal consistency for the NDI-BR (r = 0.74) and the three subscales of the NPDS-BR (subscale 1, r = 0.89; subscale 2, r = 0.81; subscale 3, r = 0.72). Test-retest reliability was also acceptable at for the NDI-BR (0.98 at baseline and 0.48 at 7 days) and subset one (0.96 at baseline and 0.91 at 7 days), subset 2 (0.96 at baseline and 0.62 at 7 days), and subset 3 (0.52 at baseline and 0.45 at 7 days) of the NPDS-BR. Construct validity was established during comparison of the Brazilian version of the SF-36. Only items associated with physical role, bodily pain, and emotional role failed significant correlation. Conclusions. A reliable and valid Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale was developed, which will facilitate the examination of functional performance within a large patient population, as well as cross-cultural comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1627
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Treatment based on H-reflexes testing improves disability status in patients with cervical radiculopathy [J].
Abdulwahab, SS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1999, 22 (03) :207-214
[2]   Validity and reliability of a modified version of the Neck Disability Index [J].
Ackelman, BH ;
Lindgren, U .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2002, 34 (06) :284-287
[3]  
Beaton D., 1998, RECOMMENDATIONS CROS
[4]   Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale [J].
Bicer, A ;
Yazici, A ;
Camdeviren, H ;
Erdogan, C .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (16) :959-962
[5]   The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey -: The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults [J].
Côté, P ;
Cassidy, JD ;
Carroll, L .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (15) :1689-1698
[6]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[7]  
Falcao DD, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P379
[8]  
GRONBLAD M, 1994, CLIN J PAIN, V10, P197
[9]   CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES - LITERATURE-REVIEW AND PROPOSED GUIDELINES [J].
GUILLEMIN, F ;
BOMBARDIER, C ;
BEATON, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (12) :1417-1432
[10]  
Hains F, 1998, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V21, P75