The dialogic unconscious: Psychoanalysis, discursive psychology and the nature of repression

This paper explores possible links between discursive psychology and psychoanalytic theory. At first sight, the two approaches would seem to be incompatible. Discursive psychology, in keeping with its Wittgensteinian and conversation analytic background, concentrates upon the social and discursive constitution of psychological phenomena rather than on supposed inner motivations. However, the notion of the 'dialogic unconscious' is introduced in order to suggest how processes of repression can be studied discursively. The argument for the dialogic unconscious suggests that conversational interaction can have repressive functions, as well as expressive ones. Ie is suggested that discursive psychology has tended to overlook this repressive dimension, concentrating upon the presences rather than absences in discourse. However, the conversational devices, which conversation analysts have revealed ro be vital for politeness and everyday morality, can also be seen to repress the temptation of rudeness. That being so, repression can be observed to be routinely accomplished by discursive interaction. Moreover, the notion of the dialogic unconscious nor only suggests that dialogue can be repressive, bur also that repression is itself a dialogic, or discursive, process. The implications for both discursive psychology and Freudian psychoanalytic theor) are discussed.