Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies - European community law and British gender equality policy

被引:112
作者
Alter, KJ [1 ]
Vargas, J
机构
[1] Smith Coll, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Law, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0010414000033004002
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 482
页数:31
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Who are the "masters of the treaty"? European governments and the European Court of Justice [J].
Alter, KJ .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1998, 52 (01) :121-+
[2]   JUDICIAL POLITICS IN THE EUROPEAN-COMMUNITY - EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE PATHBREAKING CASSIS-DE-DIJON DECISION [J].
ALTER, KJ ;
MEUNIERAITSAHALIA, S .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1994, 26 (04) :535-561
[3]  
ALTER KJ, IN PRESS INT ORG
[4]  
[Anonymous], POLITICS WOMENS RIGH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, HOLLOW HOPE
[6]  
[Anonymous], SEX DISCRIMINATION L
[7]  
[Anonymous], WORKING WOMEN LAW EQ
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EUROPEAN COURTS NATL
[9]  
ASMUSSEN H, 1986, LAW PUBLIC POLICY EU
[10]  
BARNARD C, 1995, NEW LEGAL DYNAMICS E, P254