Comparative parallel characterization of particle populations with two mass spectrometric systems LAMPAS 2 and SPASS

被引:17
作者
Hinz, Klaus-Peter
Erdmann, Nicole
Gruening, Carsten
Spengler, Bernhard
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Inst Inorgan & Analyt Chem, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Mainz, Inst Nucl Chem, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[3] Commiss European Communities, DG Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Climate Change Unit, I-21020 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
chemical composition; mass spectrometry; single particle analysis; atmospheric aerosol; clustering algorithm;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学]; O56 [分子物理学、原子物理学];
学科分类号
070203 [原子与分子物理]; 070304 [物理化学]; 081704 [应用化学]; 1406 [纳米科学与工程];
摘要
Two transportable laser mass spectrometers, Single Particle Analysis and Sizing System (SPASS) and Laser Mass Analyzer for Particles in the Airborne State (LAMPAS 2), have been applied to investigate the dependence of spectra patterns on instrumental parameters and data evaluation procedures in an inter-comparison experiment. Laboratory experiments showed the spectral response of both instruments for mineral particles before and after heterogeneous reactions. During a period of 47 h, both instruments determined size and chemical composition of several thousand single particles of an ambient particle population. Time-resolved evaluation (1-h resolution) of specific ion signals, which showed a characteristic temporal evolution, in combination with meteorological information, was used to select four periods for separate evaluation of particle spectra. Application of the two particle classification algorithms, fuzzy c-means clustering and k-means clustering, on the same data set (SPASS) showed only minor differences in spectral patterns and class abundances caused by the clustering method ("soft" or "hard" clustering). Spectral patterns determined for the data sets of two instruments (SPASS and LAMPAS 2) were similar for some particle types and could be compared directly (e.g., mineral or carbonaceous particles). For other types of particles, spectral patterns differed from each other and had to be interpreted using additional information on instrumental parameters (e.g., laser wavelengths or irradiance) and experimental conditions. The different response of SPASS and LAMPAS 2, as reflected in the different abundances of particle classes, indicates the necessity to determine adjustment factors for each instrument, for different particle classes, to enable a direct comparison of quantitative information from such online aerosol mass spectrometers and from bulk analysis. The reported results are an important basis for a general database of single particle spectra, spectral patterns of common and specific particle classes and abundances of these classes for atmospheric aerosols, showing their dependence on particle size, geographic location, meteorological conditions and time of analysis. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 166
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Simultaneous determination of individual ambient particle size, hygroscopicity and composition [J].
Buzorius, G ;
Zelenyuk, A ;
Brechtel, F ;
Imre, D .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (20) :35-1
[2]
Characterization of individual airborne particles by using aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry at Mace Head, Ireland [J].
Dall'Osto, M ;
Beddows, DCS ;
Kinnersley, RP ;
Harrison, RM ;
Donovan, RJ ;
Heal, MR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D21) :D213021-14
[3]
Instrument characterization and first application of the single particle analysis and sizing system (SPASS) for atmospheric aerosols [J].
Erdmann, N ;
Dell'Acqua, A ;
Cavalli, P ;
Grüning, C ;
Omenetto, N ;
Putaud, JP ;
Raes, F ;
Van Dingenen, R .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (05) :377-393
[4]
Reagentless detection and classification of individual bioaerosol particles in seconds [J].
Fergenson, DP ;
Pitesky, ME ;
Tobias, HJ ;
Steele, PT ;
Czerwieniec, GA ;
Russell, SC ;
Lebrilla, CB ;
Horn, JM ;
Coffee, KR ;
Srivastava, A ;
Pillai, SP ;
Shih, MTP ;
Hall, HL ;
Ramponi, AJ ;
Chang, JT ;
Langlois, RG ;
Estacio, PL ;
Hadley, RT ;
Frank, M ;
Gard, EE .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 76 (02) :373-378
[5]
Real-time analysis of individual atmospheric aerosol particles: Design and performance of a portable ATOFMS [J].
Gard, E ;
Mayer, JE ;
Morrical, BD ;
Dienes, T ;
Fergenson, DP ;
Prather, KA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 69 (20) :4083-4091
[6]
Relative sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single particle aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra [J].
Gross, DS ;
Gälli, ME ;
Silva, PJ ;
Prather, KA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (02) :416-422
[7]
Single particle characterization of automobile and diesel truck emissions in the Caldecott Tunnel [J].
Gross, DS ;
Gälli, ME ;
Silva, PJ ;
Wood, SH ;
Liu, DY ;
Prather, KA .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 32 (02) :152-163
[8]
Real-time measurements of the chemical composition of size-resolved particles during a Santa Ana wind episode, California USA [J].
Guazzotti, SA ;
Whiteaker, JR ;
Suess, D ;
Coffee, KR ;
Prather, KA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (19) :3229-3240
[9]
Towards direct measurement of turbulent vertical fluxes of compounds in atmospheric aerosol particles [J].
Held, A ;
Hinz, KP ;
Trimborn, A ;
Spengler, B ;
Klemm, O .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (19) :ASC8-1
[10]
Chemical classes of atmospheric aerosol particles at a rural site in Central Europe during winter [J].
Held, A ;
Hinz, KP ;
Trimborn, A ;
Spengler, B ;
Klemm, O .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (04) :581-594