Time-dependent density functional theory as a foundation for a firmer understanding of sum-over-states density functional perturbation theory: "Loc.3" approximation

被引:19
作者
Fadda, E
Casida, ME
Salahub, DR
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Chim, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] CERCA, Montreal, PQ H3X 2H9, Canada
[3] Natl Res Council Canada, Steacie Inst Mol Sci, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
sum-over-states density functional perturbation theory; NMR chemical shifts; time-dependent DFT; magnetic perturbations;
D O I
10.1002/qua.10434
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Sum-over-states density functional perturbation theory (SOS-DFPT) (Malkin, V. G.; Malkina, O0. L.; Casida, M. E.; Salahub, D. R. J Am Chem Soc 1994,116, 5898) has been successful as a method for calculating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), chemical shifts. The key to this success is the introduction of an ad hoc correction to the excitation energies represented by simple orbital energy differences in uncoupled density functional theory. It has been suggested (Jamorski, C.; Casida, M. E.; Salahub, D. R. J Chem Phys 1996, 104, 5134) that the good performance of this methodology could be partly explained by. the resemblance of the corrected excitation energy to the orbital energy difference given by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). In fact, according to exact (wave function) time-dependent perturbation theory, both magnetic and electric perturbations may be described using essentially the same simple SOS expression. However in adiabatic TDDFT, with no explicit relativistic or current density functional dependence, the functional is approximate and so the magnetic and electric SOS expressions are different. Because TDDFT. (neglecting relativistic and current density functional dependence) is formally exact for electric perturbations but not magnetic perturbations and because the two SOS expressions should have the same form, we propose that the SOS expression for electric perturbations should also be used for magnetic perturbations. We then go on to realize our theory by deriving a "Loc.3" approximation that is explicitly designed by applying the electric field SOS expression to magnetic fields within the two-level model and Tamm-Dancoff approximation. Test results for 13 small organic and inorganic molecules show that the Loc.3 approximation performs at feast as well as the "Loc.1" and "Loc.2" approximations of SOS-DFPT. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 83
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   RYDBERG NATURE AND ASSIGNMENTS OF EXCITED-STATES OF WATER MOLECULE [J].
GODDARD, WA ;
HUNT, WJ .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1974, 24 (04) :464-471
[12]   Ab initio methods for the calculation of NMR shielding and indirect spin-spin coupling constants [J].
Helgaker, T ;
Jaszunski, M ;
Ruud, K .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1999, 99 (01) :293-352
[13]   Time-dependent density functional theory within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation [J].
Hirata, S ;
Head-Gordon, M .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1999, 314 (3-4) :291-299
[14]  
Hunt WJ, 1969, CHEM PHYS LETT, V3, P414, DOI 10.1016/0009-2614(69)80154-5
[15]  
JAMESON C, 1997, J NUCL MAGN RESON, V26, P46
[16]   Understanding NMR chemical shifts [J].
Jameson, CJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 47 :135-169
[17]   Dynamic polarizabilities and excitation spectra from a molecular implementation of time-dependent density-functional response theory: N-2 as a case study [J].
Jamorski, C ;
Casida, ME ;
Salahub, DR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (13) :5134-5147
[18]  
Kutzelnigg W., 1991, NMR, V213, P165, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-75932-1_3
[19]  
Malkin V.G., 1995, Modern Density Functional Theory, V2, P273
[20]   NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SHIELDING TENSORS CALCULATED WITH A SUM-OVER-STATES DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL PERTURBATION-THEORY [J].
MALKIN, VG ;
MALKINA, OL ;
CASIDA, ME ;
SALAHUB, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 116 (13) :5898-5908