A new water footprint calculation method integrating consumptive and degradative water use into a single stand-alone weighted indicator

被引:129
作者
Ridoutt, Bradley G. [1 ]
Pfister, Stephan [2 ]
机构
[1] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Sustainable Agr Natl Res Flagship, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
[2] ETH, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Environmental labelling; ReCiPe; Water scarcity; Water stress; Water use; Weighting; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BUILDINGS; SELECTION; ENERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0458-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A complete assessment of water use in life cycle assessment (LCA) involves modelling both consumptive and degradative water use. Due to the range of environmental mechanisms involved, the results are typically reported as a profile of impact category indicator results. However, there is also demand for a single score stand-alone water footprint, analogous to the carbon footprint. To facilitate single score reporting, the critical dilution volume approach has been used to express a degradative emission in terms of a theoretical water volume, sometimes referred to as grey water. This approach has not received widespread acceptance and a new approach is proposed which takes advantage of the complex fate and effects models normally employed in LCA. Results for both consumptive and degradative water use are expressed in the reference unit H(2)Oe, enabling summation and reporting as a single stand-alone value. Consumptive water use is assessed taking into consideration the local water stress relative to the global average water stress (0.602). Concerning degradative water use, each emission is modelled separately using the ReCiPe impact assessment methodology, with results subsequently normalised, weighted and converted to the reference unit (H(2)Oe) by comparison to the global average value for consumptive water use (1.86 x 10(-3) ReCiPe points m(-3)). The new method, illustrated in a simplified case study, incorporates best practice in terms of life cycle impact assessment modelling for eutrophication, human and eco-toxicity, and is able to assimilate new developments relating to these and any other impact assessment models relevant to water pollution. The new method enables a more comprehensive and robust assessment of degradative water use in a single score stand-alone water footprint than has been possible in the past.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 217
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CO2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion Highlights
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RECIPE INTRO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, highlights
[4]  
Ashby M.F., 2009, Materials and the Environment: Eco-Informed Material Choice
[5]   Human Health Impact as a Boundary Selection Criterion in the Life Cycle Assessment of Pultruded Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Materials [J].
Basbagill, John P. ;
Lepech, Michael D. ;
Ali, Subhan M. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (02) :266-275
[6]   A life cycle assessment of injectable drug primary packaging: comparing the traditional process in glass vials with the closed vial technology (polymer vials) [J].
Belboom, Sandra ;
Renzoni, Robert ;
Verjans, Benoit ;
Leonard, Angelique ;
Germain, Albert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (02) :159-167
[7]   Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure [J].
Dittenber, David B. ;
GangaRao, Hota V. S. .
COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2012, 43 (08) :1419-1429
[8]  
Frischknecht R., 2007, Ecoinvent Rep, V1
[9]  
Goedkoop M., 2009, LIFE CYCLE IMPACT AS, P1
[10]  
Grant T, 2010, AUSTRALASIAN SIMAPRO