437 classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomies in 8 years

被引:24
作者
Morrison, JE
Jacobs, VR
机构
[1] Fayette Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Fayette, AL USA
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Frauenklin OB GYN, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS | 2001年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60621-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To report technical aspects and practical long-term experience with classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH). Design. Retrospective evaluation (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). Setting. Local community hospital in rural northwest Alabama. Patients. Four hundred thirty-seven women. Intervention. The procedure was performed as described originally but with slight modifications (vaginal manipulator, ETS stapler). Measurements and Main Results. Follow-up was 44.7 months (range 3-97 mo). Average operating time was 1 hour 70 minutes (range 46 min-6 hrs, 70 min), average blood loss was 68 ml (range 10-765 ml), average length of hospital stay was 22 hours (range 10 hrs-5 days), and average return to work was 14 days (range 3-28 days). Complications were 11 bleeding cervices (7 occurring within 21 days after surgery, and 4 between 2 and 4 yrs after surgery), 7 case of uterine artery bleeding, 7 ileus, 1 pelvic hematoma, and 5 mucoceles between 2 and 27 months postoperatively. There were three conversions, one because of morbid obesity (185 kg) and two because of large uterus.-pelvis ratio. Conclusion. CISH leaves the pelvic floor intact, has short recuperation and high patient satisfaction, and is cost effective at a low complication rate. It is an advanced laparoscopic procedure, is initially technically challenging, and has a learning curve.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 567
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   HISTOLOGIC FEATURES OF THE CISH PROCEDURE [J].
ALVAREZRODAS, E ;
METTLER, L ;
CASTRO, E ;
LUTTGES, J ;
SEMM, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 2 (01) :37-41
[2]  
*BLUE CROSS BLUE S, 2000, BLUE CROSS AL Q COST
[3]  
Bojahr B, 1996, Zentralbl Gynakol, V118, P468
[4]  
Carvajal J C, 1993, Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol, V58, P190
[5]  
DELGADO JAR, 1994, GINECOL OBSTET MEX, V62, P378
[6]  
GASSIBE EF, 1995, J AM ASS GYNECOL L S, V2, pS17
[7]  
GRUNBERGER W, 1995, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V107, P77
[8]   Measurement of CO2 hypothermia during laparoscopy and pelviscopy:: How cold it gets and how to prevent it [J].
Jacobs, VR ;
Morrison, JE ;
Mettler, L ;
Mundhenke, C ;
Jonat, W .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1999, 6 (03) :289-295
[9]  
Kim, 1996, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, V3, pS21, DOI 10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80205-2
[10]   Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [J].
Kim, DH ;
Bae, DH ;
Hur, M ;
Kim, SH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1998, 5 (03) :253-260