Estimating and contextualizing the attenuation of odds ratios due to non collapsibility

被引:17
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Case-control sampling; Confounding; Non collapsibility; Odds ratios; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BINARY DATA; MODELS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MEDIATION; INFERENCE; VARIABLES; ADJUST; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/03610926.2015.1006778
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The odds ratio is a measure commonly used for expressing the association between an exposure and a binary outcome. A feature of the odds ratio is that its value depends on the choice of the distribution over which the probabilities in the odds ratio are evaluated. In particular, this means that an odds ratio conditional on a covariate may have a different value from an odds ratio marginal on the covariate, even if the covariate is not associated with the exposure (not a confounder). We define the individual odds ratio (IORs) and population odds ratios (PORs) as the ratio of the odds of the outcome for a unit increase in the exposure, respectively, for an individual in the population and for the whole population, in which case the odds are averaged across the population. The attenuation of conditional odds ratio, marginal odds ratio, and PORs from the IOR is demonstrated in a realistic simulation exercise. The degree of attenuation differs in the whole population and in a case-control sample, and the property of invariance to outcome-dependent sampling is only true for the IOR. The relevance of the non collapsibility of odds ratios in a range of methodological areas is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 804
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ANAL LONGITUDINAL DA
[2]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[3]   Statistics in epidemiology: The case-control study [J].
Breslow, NE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (433) :14-28
[4]  
Burgess S, 2012, THESIS
[5]   Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression model [J].
Burgess, Stephen .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (27) :4726-4747
[6]  
Cameron AC., 2009, MICROECONOMETRICS US
[7]   Graphical Models for Inference Under Outcome-Dependent Sampling [J].
Didelez, Vanessa ;
Kreiner, Svend ;
Keiding, Niels .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (03) :368-387
[8]   Assumptions of IV Methods for Observational Epidemiology [J].
Didelez, Vanessa ;
Meng, Sha ;
Sheehan, Nuala A. .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (01) :22-40
[9]   A METHOD FOR COMBINING MATCHED AND UNMATCHED BINARY DATA - APPLICATION TO RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS OF PHOTOCOAGULATION IN THE TREATMENT OF DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY [J].
DUFFY, SW ;
ROHAN, TE ;
ALTMAN, DG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (02) :371-378
[10]   The role of covariates in estimating treatment effects and risk in long-term clinical trials [J].
Ford, I ;
Norrie, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (19) :2899-2908