High-dose versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: Comparison of cancer and leukemia group B trials with data from the autologous blood and marrow transplant registry

被引:47
作者
Berry, DA
Broadwater, G
Klein, JP
Antman, K
Aisner, J
Bitran, J
Costanza, M
Freytes, CO
Stadtmauer, E
Gale, RP
Henderson, IC
Lazarus, HM
McCarthy, PL
Norton, L
Parnes, H
Pecora, A
Perry, MC
Rowlings, P
Spitzer, G
Horowitz, MM
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Autologous Blood & Marrow Transplant Registry, Milwaukee, WI USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Hlth Policy Inst, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[8] Inst Canc Res, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[9] Progenitor Cell Therapy LLC, Saddle Brook, NJ USA
[10] Canc & Leukemia Grp B, Chicago, IL USA
[11] Lutheran Gen Hosp, Park Ridge, IL 60068 USA
[12] Univ Massachusetts, Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[13] Univ Penn, Ctr Canc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[14] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[15] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[16] Natl Canc Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Univ Missouri, Ellis Fischel Canc Ctr, Columbia, MO USA
[18] Prince Wales Hosp, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[19] Canc Ctr Carolinas, Greenville, SC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.20.3.743
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To assess survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) versus standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC). Patients and Methods: SDC in four Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials was compared with hematopoietic stem-cell support in patients from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. Cox proportional hazard regression incorporated potentially confounding effects. A total of 1,509 women were enrolled onto CALGB trials, and 1, 188 women received HDC. No significant survival differences existed by CALGB trial or HDC regimen. Consideration was restricted to candidates for both SDC and HDC. The resulting sample included 635 SDC and 441 HDC patients. The outcome of interest was overall survival. Results: The HDC group displayed better performance status. The SDC group had slightly better survival in first year after treatment. The HDC group had lower hazard of death from years 1 to 4 and had somewhat higher probability of 5-year survival (adjusted probabilities [95% confidence intervals], 23% [17% to 29%] v 15% [11% to 19%], P = .03). Conclusion: After controlling for known prognostic factors in this nonrandomized analysis of two large independent data sets, women receiving HDC versus SDC for metastatic breast cancer have a similar short-term probability of survival, and might have a modestly higher long-term probability of survival. (C) 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 750
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC OR RECURRENT CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - A RANDOMIZED PHASE-III TRIAL COMPARING CAF VERSUS VATH VERSUS VATH ALTERNATING WITH CMFVP - CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY-8281 [J].
AISNER, J ;
CIRRINCIONE, C ;
PERLOFF, M ;
PERRY, M ;
BUDMAN, D ;
ABRAMS, J ;
PANASCI, L ;
MUSS, H ;
CITRON, M ;
HOLLAND, J ;
WOOD, W ;
HENDERSON, IC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (06) :1443-1452
[2]
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America [J].
Antman, KH ;
Rowlings, PA ;
Vaughan, WP ;
Pelz, CJ ;
Fay, JW ;
Fields, KK ;
Freytes, CO ;
Gale, RP ;
Hillner, BE ;
Holland, HK ;
Kennedy, MJ ;
Klein, JP ;
Lazarus, HM ;
McCarthy, PL ;
Saez, R ;
Spitzer, G ;
Stadtmauer, EA ;
Williams, SF ;
Wolff, S ;
Sobocinski, KA ;
Armitage, JO ;
Horowitz, MM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :1870-1879
[3]
BERRY DA, 1990, BIOMETRICS, V46, P1227
[4]
BEZWODA WR, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, pA115
[5]
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS - PERSPECTIVES ON SOME RECENT IDEAS [J].
BYAR, DP ;
SIMON, RM ;
FRIEDEWALD, WT ;
SCHLESSELMAN, JJ ;
DEMETS, DL ;
ELLENBERG, JH ;
GAIL, MH ;
WARE, JH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 295 (02) :74-80
[6]
Safety and efficacy of using a single agent or a phase II agent before instituting standard combination chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: Report of a randomized study - Cancer and leukemia group B 8642 [J].
Costanza, ME ;
Weiss, RB ;
Henderson, IC ;
Norton, L ;
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, C ;
Winer, E ;
Wood, WC ;
Frei, E ;
McIntyre, OR ;
Schilsky, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1397-1406
[7]
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]
Patient selection in high-dose chemotherapy trials: Relevance in high-risk breast cancer [J].
GarciaCarbonero, R ;
Hidalgo, M ;
PazAres, L ;
Calzas, J ;
Gomez, H ;
Guerra, JA ;
Hitt, R ;
Hornedo, J ;
Colomer, R ;
CortesFunes, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (10) :3178-3184
[9]
A GENERALIZED WILCOXON TEST FOR COMPARING ARBITRARILY SINGLY-CENSORED SAMPLES [J].
GEHAN, EA .
BIOMETRIKA, 1965, 52 :203-+
[10]
Hudis CA, 1999, SEMIN ONCOL, V26, P35