Development and psychometric properties of the dialysis module of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version

被引:31
作者
Yang, SC
Kuo, PW
Wang, JD
Lin, MI
Su, S
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Hlth Care Org Adm, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Occupat Med & Ind Hyg, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
dialysis module; hemodialysis; quality of life; WHOQOL;
D O I
10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60121-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Quality of life (QOL) is now considered to be an important part of the assessment of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the dialysis module of the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) Taiwan version [WHOQOL-BREF(TW)] in patients undergoing regular hemodialysis (HD). Methods: QOL Survey was administered to 283 regular HD patients in metropolitan Taipei. The instruments used included: (1) the proposed module - composed of the core part, the WHOQOL-BREF(TW), and the six specific items; (2) the symptom/problem (S/P) scale - composed of 12 items specific for dialysis patients; (3) the utility measure, which was performed with standard gamble (SC) methods; and (4) the rating scale (RS). Results: Based on the six criteria of validity, reliability and variance of the items, four HD-specific items were selected. Reliability study showed that Cronbach's alphas, composite reliability, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation at an average retest interval of 4-8 weeks) of the four domains of physical, psychological, social relationship and environment, ranged from 0.74-0.82, 0.79-0.84 and 0.6 1 -0.79, respectively. Validity study showed that all the correlations between an item and its corresponding domain were highly significant (r > 0.4, p < 0.01) and larger than the correlations between the item and other domains. SC and psychometric measures showed relatively low correlations (0.12-0.26). The module showed the same construct as the WHOQOL-BREF-(TW) under confirmatory factor analysis, whereas the exploratory factor analysis showed mild variation. Convergent and discriminant validity were good. Global QOL, physical, psychological and environment domains had some sensitivity to differentiate the severity of the condition of patients receiving HID. Clinical validity was demonstrated in global QOL, physical and psychological domains to have significant correlations with S/P scores. Conclusion: Besides broader coverage than the core WHOQOL-BREF(TW), the dialysis module of the WHOQOL-BREF(TW) is a valid, reliable and sensitive QOL instrument for the assessment of HD patients in Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 309
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]
[Anonymous], 2000, Quality of life. Assessment
[3]
Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Patrick, DL ;
Bushnell, DM ;
Martin, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) :1-12
[4]
Quality of life measurement - Will we ever be satisfied? [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Patrick, DL ;
Bushnell, DM ;
Martin, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) :19-23
[5]
ESTIMATING THE RELIABILITY OF CONTINUOUS MEASURES WITH CRONBACH ALPHA OR THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT - TOWARD THE INTEGRATION OF 2 TRADITIONS [J].
BRAVO, G ;
POTVIN, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (4-5) :381-390
[6]
Formal literature review of quality-of-life instruments used in end-stage renal disease [J].
Cagney, KA ;
Wu, AW ;
Fink, NE ;
Jenckes, MW ;
Meyer, KB ;
Bass, EB ;
Powe, NR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2000, 36 (02) :327-336
[7]
Chen J, 1999, NAV RES LOG, V46, P57, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199902)46:1<57::AID-NAV4>3.0.CO
[8]
2-H
[9]
Chen M., 1998, NURS RES, V6, P393
[10]
DAUGIRDAS JT, 2001, HDB DIALYSIS, P15