Economic analysis in dermatology

被引:24
作者
Ellis, CN [1 ]
Reiter, KL
Wheeler, JRC
Fendrick, AM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, A Alfred Taubman Ctr 1910, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Dermatol Serv, Dept Vet Affairs, Michigan Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Div Gen Med, Dept Internal Med & Consortium Hlth Outcomes Inno, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mjd.2002.119566
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Cost-effectiveness studies are rising in importance as means for justifying expenditures on health interventions and as guides for making treatment and resource allocation decisions, However, the term "cost-effective" often is used erroneously, attributed to therapies that have not been subjected to rigorous cost analysis or comparison to an appropriate alternative. Health economic studies include cost-of-illness, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit analyses. Each of these types of analyses differs in what it measures and under what circumstances its use is appropriate. This article describes the different types of economic studies, using examples to highlight their key features, and provides a summary of the key components of an economic analysis including perspective, cost and outcomes measurement, time horizon, cost-discounting, and sensitivity analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 283
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine
[3]   The economic value of informal caregiving [J].
Arno, PS ;
Levine, C ;
Memmott, MM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1999, 18 (02) :182-188
[4]   Paradigm lost [J].
Bigby, M .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 136 (01) :26-27
[5]   Quality of life issues in pediatric dermatology [J].
Chamlin, SL ;
Chren, MM .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DERMATOLOGY-US, 2000, 12 (03) :123-125
[6]   Cost-comparison analysis versus cost-effectiveness analysis: An important difference [J].
Chen, S ;
Bayoumi, AM ;
Goldstein, MK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 41 (06) :1050-1050
[7]   Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of using methotrexate vs Goeckerman therapy for psoriasis - A pilot study [J].
Chen, S ;
Shaheen, A ;
Garber, A .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (12) :1602-1608
[8]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[9]  
EINARSON TR, 1993, J DERMATOL TREAT S3, V4, pS23
[10]   Cost-effectiveness comparison of therapy for psoriasis with a methotrexate-based regimen versus a rotation regimen of modified cyclosporine and methotrexate [J].
Ellis, CN ;
Reiter, KL ;
Bandekar, RR ;
Fendrick, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 46 (02) :242-250