The quality of reporting in clinical research: the CONSORT and STROBE initiatives

被引：29

作者：

Bolignano, Davide ^{[1
]}

Mattace-Raso, Francesco ^{[2
]}

Torino, Claudia ^{[1
]}

D'Arrigo, Graziella ^{[1
]}

Abd ElHafeez, Samar ^{[1
]}

Provenzano, Fabio ^{[1
]}

Zoccali, Carmine ^{[1
]}

Tripepi, Giovanni ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] CNR IBIM, Ist Biomed Epidemiol Clin & Fisiopatol Malattie R, I-89124 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy

[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Geriatr & Internal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands

来源：

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH | 2013年 / 25卷 / 01期

关键词：

Randomized controlled trials; Observational studies; CONSORT; STROBE; EQUATOR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;

D O I：

10.1007/s40520-013-0007-z

中图分类号：

R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;

摘要：

Inaccurate reporting of data hampers the generalizability and the correct interpretation of results of scientific medical papers. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiatives, both included in the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) international network, have elaborated appropriate guidelines in order to improve the transparence, clearness and completeness of scientific literature. The CONSORT statement consists of a 25 items checklist and a flow-chart diagram which provide guidance to Authors on how to report randomized clinical trials. The STROBE is a checklist of 22 items which should be addressed when observational studies (case-control, cohort and cross-sectional) are made up. Many editorial committees and prestigious international journals have now embraced these guidelines to improve the quality and methodology of their scientific reports.

引用

页码：9 / 15

页数：7

共 19 条

[1] THE SCANDAL OF POOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH [J].

ALTMAN, DG .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6924) :283-284

[2] A PROPOSAL FOR STRUCTURED REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].

ANDREW, E ;

ANIS, A ;

CHALMERS, T ;

CHO, M ;

CLARKE, M ;

FELSON, D ;

GOTZSCHE, P ;

GREENE, R ;

JADAD, A ;

JONAS, W ;

KLASSEN, T ;

KNIPSCHILD, P ;

LAUPACIS, A ;

MEINERT, CL ;

MOHER, D ;

NICHOL, G ;

OXMAN, A ;

PENMAN, MF ;

POCOCK, S ;

REISCH, J ;

SACKETT, D ;

SCHULZ, K ;

SNIDER, J ;

TUGWELL, P ;

TYSON, J ;

VARIN, F ;

WALOP, W ;

WALSH, S ;

WELLS, G .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (24) :1926-1931

[3] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].

Begg, C ;

Cho, M ;

Eastwood, S ;

Horton, R ;

Moher, D ;

Olkin, I ;

Pitkin, R ;

Rennie, D ;

Schulz, KF ;

Simel, D ;

Stroup, DF .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639

[4]

Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215

[5] Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals [J].

Chan, AW ;

Altman, DG .

LANCET, 2005, 365 (9465) :1159-1162

[6] News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [J].

Davidoff, F .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (03) :229-231

[7] Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials [J].

Egger, M ;

Jüni, P ;

Bartlett, C .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15) :1996-1999

[8] CALL FOR COMMENTS ON A PROPOSAL TO IMPROVE REPORTING OF CLINICAL-TRIALS IN THE BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE [J].

FACKLER, ML ;

HUTH, EJ ;

PITKIN, RM ;

RENNIE, D ;

BEGG, C ;

GREENLAND, S ;

OLKIN, I ;

STROUP, DF ;

DEEN, DF ;

LAU, J ;

DERISH, P ;

EASTWOOD, S ;

LANG, T ;

NICHOLS, K .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (11) :894-895

[9] Assessing the quality of research [J].

Glasziou, P ;

Vandenbroucke, J ;

Chalmers, I .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7430) :39-41

[10] The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed [J].

Hopewell, Sally ;

Dutton, Susan ;

Yu, Ly-Mee ;

Chan, An-Wen ;

Altman, Douglas G. .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :c723

← 1 2 →