Midfacial morphology in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different surgical protocols

被引:38
作者
Swennen, G
Berten, JL
Schliephake, H
Treutlein, C
Dempf, R
Malevez, C
De Mey, A
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Orthodont, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Brussels, ULB, Childrens Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, B-1020 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
cleft lip palate; cranio-facial morphology; cephalometry;
D O I
10.1054/ijom.2001.0177
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare cranio-facial, particularly midfacial morphology, in two groups of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at two different cleft centres (Hannover, Germany and Brussels, Belgium) following different surgical treatment protocols. A total of 62 children (40 males; 22 females) with non-syndrome UCLP were included in this study at approximately the age of 10. The Hannover group comprised 36 children, who had repair of the lip at a mean age of 5.83 +/-1.16 months, followed by repair of the hard and soft palate at a mean age of 29.08 +/- 4.68 and 32.25 +/- 4.29 months, respectively. The Brussels group consisted of 26 children who underwent surgical treatment according to the Malek protocol: the soft palate was closed at a mean age of 3.04 +/- 0.20 months, followed by simultaneous repair of the lip and hard palate at a mean age of 6.15 +/- 0.68 months. Midfacial morphology was evaluated by means of cephalometric analysis according to Ross. The children in the Hannover UCLP group did not differ significantly from those in the Brussels group in the anteroposterior dimension of the midface. However, the maxillary plane was significantly more open in the Brussels group due to less posterior vertical maxillary development.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ASHERMCDADE C, 1992, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V29, P409, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0409:ASCISO>2.3.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   GROWTH STATUS OF CHILDREN TREATED FOR UNILATERAL CLEFT-LIP AND PALATE [J].
BUSCHANG, PH ;
SCHROEDER, JN ;
GENECOV, E ;
SALYER, KE .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 88 (03) :413-419
[4]  
De Mey A, 1992, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V37, P174
[5]   AVOIDANCE OF THE USE OF VOMERINE MUCOSA IN PRIMARY SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF VELOPALATINE CLEFTS [J].
DELAIRE, J ;
PRECIOUS, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1985, 60 (06) :589-597
[6]  
DEMPF R, IN PRESS CLEFT PALAT
[7]  
Enlow DH, 1996, ESSENTIALS FACIAL GR, P79
[8]   CRANIOFACIAL AND OCCLUSAL CHARACTERISTICS IN UNILATERAL CLEFT-LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS FROM 4 SCANDINAVIAN CENTERS [J].
FRIEDE, H ;
ENEMARK, H ;
SEMB, G ;
PAULIN, G ;
ABYHOLM, F ;
BOLUND, S ;
LILJA, J ;
OSTRUP, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1991, 25 (03) :269-276
[9]   Comparisons of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different regimens for two-stage palatal repair [J].
Friede, H ;
Priede, D ;
Möller, M ;
Maulina, I ;
Lilja, J ;
Barkane, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1999, 33 (01) :73-81
[10]  
Hausamen J E, 1986, Quintessenz, V37, P195