Anatomy-based three-dimensional dose optimization in brachytherapy using multiobjective genetic algorithms

被引:51
作者
Lahanas, M
Baltas, D [1 ]
Zamboglou, N
机构
[1] Stadt Kliniken Offenbach, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Strahlenklin, D-63069 Offenbach, Germany
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Inst Commun & Comp Syst, GR-15773 Zografos, Athens, Greece
关键词
optimization; brachytherapy; COIN; dose-volume histograms; multiobjective genetic algorithms;
D O I
10.1118/1.598697
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In conventional dose optimization algorithms, in brachytherapy, multiple objectives are expressed in terms of an aggregating function which combines individual objective values into a single utility value, making the problem single objective, prior to optimization. A multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) was developed for dose optimization based on an a posteriori approach, leaving the decision-making process to a planner and offering a representative trade-off surface of the various objectives. The MOGA provides a flexible search engine which provides the maximum of information for a decision maker. Tests performed with various treatment plans in brachytherapy have shown that MOGA gives solutions which are superior to those of traditional dose optimization algorithms. Objectives were proposed in terms of the COW distribution and differential volume histograms, taking into account patient anatomy in the optimization process. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(99)00309-0].
引用
收藏
页码:1904 / 1918
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A NATURAL VOLUME-DOSE HISTOGRAM FOR BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
ANDERSON, LL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (06) :898-903
[2]  
Anderson LL, 1995, BRACHYTHERAPY PHYSICS, P343
[3]   A conformal index (COIN) to evaluate implant quality and dose specification in brachytherapy [J].
Baltas, D ;
Kolotas, C ;
Geramani, K ;
Mould, RF ;
Ioannidis, G ;
Kekchidi, M ;
Zamboglou, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (02) :515-524
[4]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[5]  
EDMUNDSON GK, 1990, BRACHYTHERAPY HDR LD
[6]  
FONSECA C, 1995, 564 U SHEFF DEP AUT
[7]   An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization [J].
Fonseca, Carlos M. ;
Fleming, Peter J. .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1995, 3 (01) :1-16
[8]  
GOLDBERG D, 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHIMS
[9]  
Goldberg D. E., 1987, Genetic Algorithms and their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, P41
[10]  
Horn J., 1993, 93005 ILLIGAL U ILL, P1