Impulsive and premeditated aggression: a factor analysis of self-reported acts

被引:196
作者
Barratt, ES
Stanford, MS
Dowdy, L
Liebman, MJ
Kent, TA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ New Orleans, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Univ Houston Clear Lake, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Neurol, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Pharmacol, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
关键词
aggressive acts questionnaire; psychometrics; construct validity; self-report; normal college students; principal component analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00024-4
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Although aggression research in general has been hampered by a lack of objective measurements of aggressive acts, two types of aggressive acts, impulsive vs, premeditated, have been studied extensively in recent years. These two types of aggression have been primarily measured by structured or semi-structured interviews. The current study was designed to assess the construct validity of these two types of aggression using a self-report questionnaire which included items gleaned from the content of interviews used in past studies. For this study, 216 college students assessed their own aggressive acts rather than answering general questions about aggression. The students were not significantly different from normative sample groups on self-report measures of impulsiveness, aggression, and anger/hostility. A PCA factor analysis with a promax rotation of the items on the self-report questionnaire identified four factors: impulsive aggression; mood on the day the act occurred; premeditated aggression; and agitation. Thus, impulsive and premeditated aggression are independent constructs which exist in varying degrees among these 'normal' persons in a non-clinical sample. Impulsive aggression was characterized in part by feelings of remorse following the acts and by thought confusion. Premeditated aggression was related to social gain and dominance. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1950, FUNDAMENTAL STAT PSY
  • [2] DISTINGUISHING INSTRUMENTAL AND HOSTILE AGGRESSION - DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    ATKINS, MS
    STOFF, DM
    OSBORNE, ML
    BROWN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 21 (04) : 355 - 365
  • [3] Barratt E S, 1991, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, V3, pS35
  • [4] Barratt E. S., 1995, PERSONALITY CHARACTE
  • [5] Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression
    Barratt, ES
    Stanford, MS
    Kent, TA
    Felthous, A
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 41 (10) : 1045 - 1061
  • [6] The effects of phenytoin on impulsive and premeditated aggression: A controlled study
    Barratt, ES
    Stanford, MS
    Felthous, AR
    Kent, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 17 (05) : 341 - 349
  • [7] A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PHENYTOIN IN IMPULSIVE AGGRESSION
    BARRATT, ES
    KENT, TA
    BRYANT, SG
    FELTHOUS, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 11 (06) : 388 - 389
  • [8] Barratt ES, 1998, BEHAV SCI LAW, V16, P285, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199822)16:3<285::AID-BSL308>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-4
  • [10] BARRATT ES, 1995, S AM PSYCH ASS ANN M