Complications of central venous catheters:: Internal jugular versus subclavian access -: A systematic review

被引:397
作者
Ruesch, S [1 ]
Walder, B
Tramèr, MR
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Anaesthesiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Surg Intens Care, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Anaesthesiol Pharmacol & Surg Intens Care, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
meta-analysis; bloodstream infection; pneumothorax; hematothorax; arterial puncture; malposition; catheter; complications; risk; harm;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200202000-00031
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To test whether complications happen more often with the internal jugular or the subclavian central venous approach. Data Source: Systematic search (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, bibliographies) up to June 30, 2000, with no language restriction. Study Selection: Reports on prospective comparisons of internal jugular vs. subclavian catheter insertion, with dichotomous data on complications. Data Extraction: No valid randomized trials were found. Seventeen prospective comparative trials with data on 2,085 jugular and 2,428 subclavian catheters were analyzed. Meta-analyses were performed with relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), using fixed and random effects models. Data Synthesis: In six trials (2,010 catheters), there were significantly more arterial punctures with jugular catheters compared with subclavian (3.0% vs. 0.5%, RR 4.70 [95% Cl, 2.05-10.77]). In six trials (1,299 catheters), there were significantly less malpositions with the jugular access (5.3% vs. 9.3%, RR 0.66 [0.44-0.99]). In three trials (707 catheters), the incidence of bloodstream infection was 8.6% with the jugular access and 4.0% with the subclavian access (RR 2.24 [0.62-8.09]). In ten trials (3,420 catheters), the incidence of hemato- or pneumothorax was 1.3% vs. 1.5% (RR 0.76 [0.43-1.33]). In four trials (899), the incidence of vessel occlusion was 0% vs. 1.2% (RR 0.29 [0.07-1.33]). Conclusions: There are more arterial punctures but less catheter malpositions with the internal jugular compared with the subclavian access. There is no evidence of any difference in the incidence of hemato- or pneumothorax and vessel occlusion. Data on bloodstream infection are scarce. These data are from non-randomized studies; selection bias cannot be ruled out. In terms of risk, the data most likely represent a best case scenario. For rational decision-making, randomized trials are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 460
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ADAM KA, 1996, NUTRITION, V12, P208
[2]   CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION IN THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT [J].
AGEE, KR ;
BALK, RA .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1992, 8 (04) :677-686
[3]   THROMBOSIS AFTER CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION [J].
AHMED, N ;
PAYNE, RF .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1976, 1 (08) :217-220
[4]   INFECTION OF HEMODIALYSIS CATHETERS - INCIDENCE AND MECHANISMS [J].
ALMIRALL, J ;
GONZALEZ, J ;
RELLO, J ;
CAMPISTOL, JM ;
MONTOLIU, J ;
DELABELLACASA, JP ;
REVERT, L ;
GATELL, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 1989, 9 (06) :454-459
[5]  
Barrera R, 1996, CANCER, V78, P2025, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<2025::AID-CNCR26>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-T
[7]   MATERIAL THROMBOGENICITY IN CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION .1. A COMPARISON BETWEEN UNCOATED AND HEPARIN-COATED, LONG ANTEBRACHIAL, POLYETHYLENE CATHETERS [J].
BENNEGARD, K ;
CURELARU, I ;
GUSTAVSSON, B ;
LINDER, LE ;
ZACHRISSON, BF .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 26 (02) :112-120
[8]   PERCUTANEOUS CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION PERFORMED BY MEDICAL HOUSE OFFICERS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
BOLINN, GW ;
ANDERSON, DJ ;
ANDERSON, KC ;
MCGOON, MD .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1982, 8 (01) :23-29
[9]  
CAIROLI R, 1993, HAEMATOLOGICA, V78, P418
[10]   Cardiac tamponade from central venous catheters [J].
Collier, PE ;
Blocker, SH ;
Graff, DM ;
Doyle, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 176 (02) :212-214