Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective

被引:254
作者
Scheibe, Kevin P. [1 ]
Blackhurst, Jennifer [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Supply Chain & Informat Syst, Ames, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Management Sci, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
supply chain risk management; disruption management; supply chain disruption propagation; systemic risk; case study; GROUNDED THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; STRATEGIC CHANGE; NETWORK; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
When a disruption occurs in a firm, its effects are often felt throughout the supply chain. As supply chains expand globally and companies pursue velocity and efficiency, the probability of disruptions propagating throughout a chain grows. In this paper, we employ a qualitative, grounded theory case study approach to help understand what drives supply chain disruption propagation and to provide theoretical insights into this emerging area. For a more complete perspective, we study three interconnected tiers in seven unique supply chains. Each supply chain triad consists of (1) a focal firm (a manufacturer), (2) a supplier to the focal firm and (3) a customer of the focal firm allowing us to gain perspective from three levels in multiple supply chains. Three aggregate dimensions are defined which help explain the propagation of supply chain disruptions: the nature of the disruption, structure and dependence, and managerial decision-making. Within these dimensions, six themes are identified giving an increased level of granularity into disruption propagation: correlation of risk, compounding effects, cyclical linkages, counterparty risk, herding and misaligned incentives. Organisations should consider these themes and their interactions to effectively deal with supply chain disruptions.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 59
页数:17
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Systemic risk assessment: a case study [J].
Ackermann, F. ;
Eden, C. ;
Williams, T. ;
Howick, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2007, 58 (01) :39-51
[2]  
Alvesson M, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1265, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586822
[3]  
[Anonymous], EXTREME RISK MANAGME
[4]  
[Anonymous], WASHINGTON POST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1002 FRB CLEAV
[6]  
[Anonymous], NEW DIRECTIONS UNDER
[7]  
[Anonymous], WALL STREET J
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG R
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies
[10]  
[Anonymous], SYST RISK INF STUD