On different approaches to estimate the mass fractal dimension of coal aggregates

被引:51
作者
Liao, JYH [1 ]
Selomulya, C [1 ]
Bushell, G [1 ]
Bickert, G [1 ]
Amal, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, ARC Ctr Funct Nanomat, Sch Chem Engn & Ind Chem, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
aggregate structure; fractal dimension measurement; image analysis; light scattering; micron-scale; settling;
D O I
10.1002/ppsc.200500978
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 [物理化学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
Several methods to measure the structures of coal aggregates are compared. Loose and compact coal aggregates were generated through flocculation of ultrafine coal particles (mean volume diameter of 12 mu m) under specific shearing conditions. Aggregate structure in terms of mass fractal dimension, D-f, was determined using various methods; namely 2D and 3D image analysis, interpretation of intensity patterns from small angle light scattering, changes in aggregation state through light obscuration, and settling behavior. In this study, the measured values of D-f ranged from 1.84-2.19 for coal aggregates with more open structures, and around 2.27-2.66 for the compact ones. All of these approaches could distinguish structural differences between aggregates, albeit with variation in D-f values estimated by the different techniques. The discrepancy in the absolute values for fractal dimension is due to the different physical properties measured by each approach, depending on the assumptions used to infer D-f from measurable parameters. In addition, image analysis and settling techniques are based on the examination of individual aggregates, such that a large number of data points are required to yield statistically representative estimations. Light scattering and obscuration measure the aggregates collectively to give average D-f values of the particulate systems; consequently ignoring any structural variation between the aggregates, and leaving possible small contaminations undetected (e.g. by dust particles or air bubbles). Appropriate utilization of a particular method is thus largely determined by system properties and required data quality.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 309
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1986, PARTICUL SCI TECHNOL
[2]
A light scattering study of the fractal aggregation behavior of a model colloidal system [J].
Burns, JL ;
Yan, YD ;
Jameson, GJ ;
Biggs, S .
LANGMUIR, 1997, 13 (24) :6413-6420
[3]
Measurement of fractal aggregates of polydisperse particles using small-angle light scattering [J].
Bushell, G ;
Amal, R .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2000, 221 (02) :186-194
[4]
BUSHELL G, 2005, IN PRESS CHEM ENG J
[5]
On techniques for the measurement of the mass fractal dimension of aggregates [J].
Bushell, GC ;
Yan, YD ;
Woodfield, D ;
Raper, J ;
Amal, R .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 95 (01) :1-50
[6]
Structure of conditioned sludge flocs [J].
Chu, CP ;
Lee, DJ ;
Peng, XF .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (08) :2125-2134
[7]
Range of validity of the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans theory for optics of fractal aggregates [J].
Farias, TL ;
Koylu, UO ;
Carvalho, MG .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1996, 35 (33) :6560-6567
[8]
Bridging flocculation studied by light scattering and settling [J].
Glover, SM ;
Yan, YD ;
Jameson, GJ ;
Biggs, S .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2000, 80 (1-3) :3-12
[9]
Gmachowski L, 1999, WATER RES, V33, P1114
[10]
Settling velocities of fractal aggregates [J].
Johnson, CP ;
Li, XY ;
Logan, BE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (06) :1911-1918