Assessing the validity of clinical trials

被引:56
作者
Akobeng, Anthony K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Booth Hall Childrens Hosp, Cent Manchester Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
[2] Booth Hall Childrens Hosp, Manchester Childrens Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol, Manchester M9 7AA, Lancs, England
关键词
bias; error; external validity; internal validity; random error; randomised controlled trial; systematic;
D O I
10.1097/MPG.0b013e31816c749f
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical trials use scientific methods to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatments or other interventions. Trials should have both internal and external validity, and a well-conducted randomised controlled trial is considered to be the most powerful tool for evaluating interventions. Systematic error (bias) and random error could threaten the internal validity of trials, and all efforts should be made to minimise these in the design, conduct, and analysis of studies. Careful attention should be paid to issues such as randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding, and sample sire. In an internally valid trial. external validity refers to the ability of the results to be generalised to the "real world" population. Issues to consider in determining the external validity of a study include the setting of the trial, the study population, the types of interventions used, duration of follow-up, and the types of outcome and how they were assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 282
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Understanding randomised controlled trials [J].
Akobeng, AK .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2005, 90 (08) :840-844
[2]
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[3]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]
Bias in clinical intervention research [J].
Gluud, LL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (06) :493-501
[5]
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials [J].
Hollis, S ;
Campbell, F .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7211) :670-+
[6]
Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials [J].
Jüni, P ;
Altman, DG ;
Egger, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7303) :42-46
[7]
Katz M.H., 1999, MULTIVARIABLE ANAL P
[8]
Control of error in randomized clinical trials [J].
Keirse, MJNC ;
Hanssens, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (01) :67-74
[9]
Designing a research project: randomised controlled trials and their principles [J].
Kendall, JM .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (02) :164-168
[10]
Last JM, 2001, DICT EPIDEMIOLOGY