A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables

被引:232
作者
Fox, MP [1 ]
Lash, TL
Greenland, S
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Geriatr Sect, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Stat, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
epidemiological methods; misclassification; Monte Carlo method; sensitivity and specificity; sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyi184
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Misclassification bias is present in most studies, yet uncertainty about its magnitude or direction is rarely quantified. Methods The authors present a method for probabilistic sensitivity analysis to quantify likely effects of misclassification of a dichotomous outcome, exposure or covariate. This method involves reconstructing the data that would have been observed had the misclassified variable been correctly classified, given the sensitivity and specificity of classification. The accompanying SAS macro implements the method and allows users to specify ranges of sensitivity and specificity of misclassification parameters to yield simulation intervals that incorporate both systematic and random error. Results The authors illustrate the method and the accompanying SAS macro code by applying it to a study of the relation between occupational resin exposure and lung-cancer deaths. The authors compare the results using this method with the conventional result, which accounts for random error only, and with the original sensitivity analysis results. Conclusion By accounting for plausible degrees of misclassification, investigators can present study results in a way that incorporates uncertainty about the bias due to misclassification, and so avoid misleadingly precise-looking results.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / 1376
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF MISCLASSIFICATION ON ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE RISK [J].
BARRON, BA .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (02) :414-418
[2]   BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :411-423
[3]  
Carroll RJ., 1995, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO
[4]   CORRELATED NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATIONS OF DISEASE AND EXPOSURE - APPLICATION TO A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN HANDEDNESS AND IMMUNE DISORDERS [J].
CHAVANCE, M ;
DELLATOLAS, G ;
LELLOUCH, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 21 (03) :537-546
[5]  
DOSEMECI M, 1990, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V132, P746, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115716
[6]   A GENERAL-APPROACH TO ANALYZING EPIDEMIOLOGIC DATA THAT CONTAIN MISCLASSIFICATION ERRORS [J].
ESPELAND, MA ;
HUI, SL .
BIOMETRICS, 1987, 43 (04) :1001-1012
[7]   EFFECTS OF MISCLASSIFICATION ON BIAS IN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2 PROPORTIONS AND RELATIVE ODDS IN FOURFOLD TABLE [J].
GOLDBERG, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (351) :561-567
[8]   EVIDENCE AND SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH [J].
GOODMAN, SN ;
ROYALL, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1988, 78 (12) :1568-1574
[9]   CONFOUNDING AND MISCLASSIFICATION [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
ROBINS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 122 (03) :495-506
[10]   A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CANCER MORTALITY AT A TRANSFORMER-ASSEMBLY FACILITY [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
SALVAN, A ;
WEGMAN, DH ;
HALLOCK, MF ;
SMITH, TJ .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1994, 66 (01) :49-54