Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion

被引:84
作者
Boutsen, Luc [1 ]
Humphreys, Glyn W.
Praamstra, Peter
Warbrick, Tracy
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In the Thatcher illusion, a face with inverted eyes and mouth looks abnormal when upright but not when inverted. Behavioral studies have shown that thatcherization of an upright face disrupts perceptual processing of the local configuration. We recorded high-density EEG from normal observers to study ERP correlates of the illusion during the perception of faces and nonface objects, to determine whether inversion and thatcherization affect similar neural mechanisms. Observers viewed faces and houses in four conditions (upright vs. inverted, and normal vs. thatcherized) while detecting an oddball category (chairs). Thatcherization delayed the N170 component over occipito-temporal cortex to faces, but not to houses. This modulation matched the illusion as it was larger for upright than inverted faces. The PI over medial occipital regions was delayed by face inversion but unaffected by thatcherization. Finally, face thatcherization delayed P2 over occipito-temporal but not over parietal regions, while inversion affected P2 across categories. All effects involving thatcherization were face-specific. These results indicate that effects of face inversion and feature inversion (in thatcherized faces) can be distinguished on a functional as well as neural level, and that they affect configural processing of faces in different time windows. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 367
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas
    Aguirre, GK
    Singh, R
    D'Esposito, M
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (01) : 189 - 194
  • [2] INVERSION AND CONFIGURATION OF FACES
    BARTLETT, JC
    SEARCY, J
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 25 (03) : 281 - 316
  • [3] Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms
    Bentin, S
    Deouell, LY
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) : 35 - 54
  • [4] Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans
    Bentin, S
    Allison, T
    Puce, A
    Perez, E
    McCarthy, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) : 551 - 565
  • [5] Priming visual face-processing mechanisms: Electrophysiological evidence
    Bentin, S
    Sagiv, N
    Mecklinger, A
    Friederici, A
    von Cramon, YD
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (02) : 190 - 193
  • [6] SCALP TOPOGRAPHY AND ANALYSIS OF INTRACRANIAL SOURCES OF FACE-EVOKED POTENTIALS
    BOTZEL, K
    SCHULZE, S
    STODIECK, SRG
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 104 (01) : 135 - 143
  • [7] The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces
    Boutsen, L
    Humphreys, GW
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06): : 955 - 975
  • [8] The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study
    Carbon, CC
    Schweinberger, SR
    Kaufmann, JM
    Leder, H
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 24 (03): : 544 - 555
  • [9] Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces
    Carmel, D
    Bentin, S
    [J]. COGNITION, 2002, 83 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [10] WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE
    DIAMOND, R
    CAREY, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) : 107 - 117