Quantum lower bounds by polynomials

被引:320
作者
Beals, R
Buhrman, H
Cleve, R
Mosca, M
De Wolf, R
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Math, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] CWI, NL-1009 AB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Comp Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Waterloo, Ctr Appl Cryptog Res, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
theory; algorithms; performance; quantum computing; query complexity; black-box model; lower bounds; polynomial method;
D O I
10.1145/502090.502097
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We examine the number of queries to input variables that a quantum algorithm requires to compute Boolean functions on (0, 1}(N) in the black-box model. We show that the exponential quantum speed-up obtained for partial functions (i.e., problems involving a promise on the input) by Deutsch and Jozsa, Simon, and Shor cannot be obtained for any total function: if a quantum algorithm computes some total Boolean function f with small error probability using T black-box queries, then there is a classical deterministic algorithm that computes f exactly with O(T-6) queries. We also give asymptotically tight characterizations of T for all symmetric f in the exact, zero-error, and bounded-error settings. Finally, we give new precise bounds for AND, OR, and PARITY. Our results are a quantum extension of the so-called polynomial method, which has been successfully applied in classical complexity theory, and also a quantum extension of results by Nisan about a polynomial relationship between randomized and deterministic decision tree complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 797
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   DETERMINING THE MAJORITY [J].
ALONSO, L ;
REINGOLD, EM ;
SCHOTT, R .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1993, 47 (05) :253-255
[2]   Note on quantum black-box complexity of almost all Boolean functions [J].
Ambainis, A .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1999, 71 (01) :5-7
[3]  
Ambainis A., 2000, Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, P636, DOI 10.1145/335305.335394
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, QUANTPH9511026
[5]  
[Anonymous], PROBABILISTIC ALGORI
[6]   Quantum lower bounds by polynomials [J].
Beals, R ;
Buhrman, H ;
Cleve, R ;
Mosca, M ;
de Wolf, R .
39TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :352-361
[7]  
Beigel R., 1993, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference (Cat. No.93CH3281-3), P82, DOI 10.1109/SCT.1993.336538
[8]   Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing [J].
Bennett, CH ;
Bernstein, E ;
Brassard, G ;
Vazirani, U .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1997, 26 (05) :1510-1523
[9]  
Boneh D, 1995, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V963, P424
[10]  
Boyer M, 1998, FORTSCHR PHYS, V46, P493, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199806)46:4/5<493::AID-PROP493>3.0.CO