Sham device versus inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments

被引:376
作者
Kaptchuk, TJ [1 ]
Stason, WB
Davis, RB
Legedza, ATR
Schnyer, RN
Kerr, CE
Stone, DA
Nam, BH
Kirsch, I
Goldman, RH
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Osher Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] City Coll Greece, SE European Res Ctr, Thessaloniki 54624, Greece
[5] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2006年 / 332卷 / 7538期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38726.603310.55
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether a sham device (a validated sham acupuncture needle) has a greater placebo effect than all inert pill in patients with persistent arm pain. Design A single blind randomised controlled trial created from the two week placebo run-in periods for two nested trials that compared acupuncture and amitriptyline with their respective placebo controls. Comparison of participants who remained oil placebo continued beyond the run-in period to the end of the Study. Setting Academic medical centre. Participants 270 adults with arm pain due to repetitive use that had lasted at least three months despite treatment and who scored ! 3 oil a 10 point pain scale. Interventions Acupuncture with sham device twice a week for six weeks or placebo pill once a day for eight weeks. Main outcome measures Arm pain measured oil a 10 point pain scale. Secondary Outcomes were symptoms measured by the Levine symptom severity scale, function measured by Pransky's upper extremity function scale, and grip strength. Results Pain decreased during the two week placebo run-in period in both the sham device and placebo pill groups, but changes were not different between the groups (- 0.14, 95% confidence interval - 0.52 to 0.25, P = 0.49). Changes in severity scores for arm symptoms and grip strength were similar between groups, but arm function improved more in the placebo pill group (2.0, 0.06 to 3.92, P = 0.04). Longitudinal regression analyses that followed participants throughout the treatment period showed significantly greater downward slopes per week oil the 10 point arm pain scale in the sham device group than in the placebo pill group (- 0.33 (- 0.40 to - 0.26) v - 0.15 (- 0.2 t to 0.09), P = 0.0001) and oil the symptom severity scale (- 0.07 (- 0.09 to - 0.05) v - 0.05 (- 0.06 to - 0.03), P 0.02). Differences were not significant, however, oil the function scale or for g-rip strength. Reported adverse effects were different in the two groups. Conclusions The sham device had greater effects than the placebo pill on self reported pain and severity of symptoms over the entire course of treatment but not during the two week placebo run ill. Placebo effects seem to be malleable and depend oil the behaviours embedded in medical rituals.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 394
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WHY THINGS BIT BACK
[2]   Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect [J].
Benedetti, F ;
Mayberg, HS ;
Wager, TD ;
Stohler, CS ;
Zubieta, JK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 25 (45) :10390-10402
[3]  
COOPER WD, 1983, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V37, P99
[4]  
*DEP HHS, EL UND MECH PLAC EFF
[5]  
ENGREN T, 1971, EXPT PSYCHOL
[6]   Effect of informed consent on anxiety in patients undergoing diagnostic electrophysiology studies [J].
Goldberger, JJ ;
Kruse, J ;
Parker, MA ;
Kadish, AH .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 134 (01) :119-126
[7]  
GUESS HA, 2002, SCI PLACEBO INTERDIS
[8]   Is the placebo powerless?: An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. [J].
Hróbjartsson, A ;
Gotzsche, PC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (21) :1594-1602
[9]   Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? [J].
Kaptchuk, TJ ;
Goldman, P ;
Stone, DA ;
Stason, WB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (08) :786-792
[10]   Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomised controlled trial [J].
Kaptchuk, TJ .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9117) :1722-1725