Flue gas conditioning for reducing suspended particulate matter from thermal power stations

被引:64
作者
Shanthakumar, S. [1 ]
Singh, D. N. [1 ]
Phadke, R. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] CHEMITHON Engn Pvt Ltd, Bombay 400104, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Suspended particulate matter (SPM); Fly ash; Pollution control devices; Electrostatic precipitator (ESP); Flue gas conditioning (FGC);
D O I
10.1016/j.pecs.2008.04.001
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Increased population and industrial development demands sustainable electricity, the majority of which is produced by thermal power stations, which utilize coal as a fuel all over the world. Coal burning results in generation of large quantities of coal residues, which contains very fine particles that tend to become air-borne and which contribute to the formation of suspended particulate matter (SPM). Hence, in order to safeguard the environment against the emission of SPM, pollution control devices, such as cyclone separators, bag filters and electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) have been employed. In addition, flue gas conditioning (FGC) is practiced to increase the efficiency of ESPs, with the addition of chemical additives, or sprinkling water to the flue gas. This process increases the collection efficiency of the electrostatic precipitators, and thereby results in reduction of the SPM level. However, the effects of the process, which play an important role in efficient FGC, need to be investigated thoroughly before utilizing this method. With this in view, a critical review of various flue gas conditioning techniques employed for controlling the SPM level in thermal power stations is presented in this paper. The present study also reports analyses of data obtained from different thermal power stations in India as well as the rest of the world. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 695
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
*ACRL, 1998, EL PREC FLY ASH AUST
[2]   Pilot plant performance of a SO2 to SO3 oxidation catalyst for flue-gas conditioning [J].
Alvarez, E ;
Blanco, J ;
Knapp, C ;
Olivares, J ;
Salvador, L .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2000, 59 (3-4) :417-422
[3]  
Anjaneyulu Y., 2002, TXB AIR POLLUTION CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV INT
[5]  
[Anonymous], AIR POLLUTION IND
[6]  
[Anonymous], IND AIR POLLUTION CO
[7]  
[Anonymous], EL PREC MAN
[8]  
[Anonymous], AIR POLLUTION CONTRO
[9]  
ARCHER WE, 1977, POWER ENG, V81, P76
[10]  
ARCHER WE, 1972, POWER ENG, V76, P50