Screening versus diagnostic mammography

被引:5
作者
Berlin, L
机构
[1] Rush N Shore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Skokie, IL 60076 USA
[2] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397089
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A survey conducted by the Physician Insurers Association of America found that the most rapidly increasing-and now the leading-cause of malpractice lawsuits filed against radiologists and all physicians is the allegation of a delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer and that among all malpractice lawsuits involving breast cancer filed against physicians, radiologists are now the most frequently named defendants. Furthermore, although an error in diagnosis was recorded in 62% of the cases, the survey also found that communication failures occurred in 71% of the cases. This same survey also emphasized the importance of having a comprehensive patient history available for the radiologist before a patient undergoes mammography. The risk management pointers that follow will help radiologists minimize the likelihood of incurring a medical malpractice lawsuit, maximize the chance for a successful defense if such a suit is filed, and ensure good patient care. Radiologists should have a system in place that ensures that every patient presenting for mammography provides the radiologist with information regarding the patient's medical history, possible symptoms, and clinical signs and that such information be provided by either the patient or the referring physician. Radiologists should make every effort to apprise themselves of all pertinent clinical information relevant to the patient before rendering interpretation of a mammogram. Effective communication between the radiologist, the patient, and the referring physician is essential. All mammographic studies should be defined as screening or as diagnostic and problem-solving breast evaluations. Diagnostic studies require on-site monitoring by a radiologist to effect proper tailoring of the examination. When such monitoring is not feasible and an incomplete evaluation has occurred, the patient should be recalled for additional evaluation with the radiologist present. Once a policy that determines whether a patient undergoes a diagnostic or a screening mammogram is in place, radiologists should not deviate from that policy. For example, if the radiology facility requires that radiologists review questionnaires completed by patients before interpreting a mammogram, the radiologist should not render such an interpretation without first reviewing such a questionnaire. If the questionnaire is missing, the radiologist should request that the patient complete another one.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 7
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1998, ACR STAND PERF DIAGN
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1995, ACR STAND PERF SCREE
[3]   Tracking for breast cancer [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (01) :93-95
[4]   Communication of the significant but not urgent finding [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) :329-331
[5]  
BERLIN L, 1998, MALPRACTICE ISSUES R, P125
[6]   Evaluation of the mammographic abnormality [J].
Brenner, RJ ;
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) :17-19
[7]  
BRODY JE, 1994, NY TIMES 1202, pB3
[8]   VARIABILITY IN RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS OF MAMMOGRAMS [J].
ELMORE, JG ;
WELLS, CK ;
LEE, CH ;
HOWARD, DH ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (22) :1493-1499
[9]   PREVIOUS MAMMOGRAMS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPALPABLE BREAST-CARCINOMA - RETROSPECTIVE VS BLINDED INTERPRETATION [J].
HARVEY, JA ;
FAJARDO, LL ;
INNIS, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 161 (06) :1167-1172
[10]   Radiography of the surgical breast biopsy specimen [J].
Homer, MJ ;
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (05) :1197-1199