Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention, and habits

被引:108
作者
Burg, J
de Vet, E
de Nooijer, J
Verplanken, B
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, Dept Hlth Educ & Promot, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Tromso, Dept Psychol, N-9001 Tromso, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jneb.2005.11.027
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: To study predictors of fruit intake in a sample of 627 adults. Design: Potential predictors of fruit intake were assessed at baseline, and fruit intake was assessed at two-week follow-up with self-administered questionnaires distributed by e-mail. Setting: The study was conducted among Dutch adult members of an Internet research panel. Participants: A random sample of 627 adults aged 18-78. Variables Measured: Attitudes, Subjective norms, self-efficacy, expected pros and cons, habit strength, intention, and fruit intake. Fruit intake was assessed with a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Analysis: Hierarchical linear and logistic regression analyses. Alpha <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sex, attitudes, Subjective norms, perceived pros, different self-efficacy expectations, and habit strength were significantly associated with the intention to eat two or more servings of fruit per day. Age, intentions, and habit strength were significant predictors of consumption of two or more servings of fruit per day. Conclusions and Implications: The results confirm that Theory of Planned Behavior constructs predict fruit intake, and that habit strength and different self-efficacy expectations may be additional determinants relevant to fruit intake. Because habitual behavior is considered to be triggered by environmental Cues, fruit promotion interventions should further explore environmental change strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours [J].
Aarts, H ;
Paulussen, T ;
Schaalma, H .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (03) :363-374
[2]   An overview of adolescent eating behavior barriers: To implementing dietary guidelines [J].
Adams, LB .
ADOLESCENT NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS: PREVENTION AND TREATMENT, 1997, 817 :36-48
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]  
Anderson A., 1994, NUTR FOOD SCI, V5, P14
[5]   ONE APPLE A DAY - FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INTAKE IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND [J].
ANDERSON, AS ;
HUNT, K ;
FORD, G ;
FINNIGAN, F .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1994, 9 (03) :297-305
[6]   A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers [J].
Anderson, ES ;
Winett, RA ;
Wojcik, JR ;
Winett, SG ;
Bowden, T .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (02) :88-100
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, WHY WE EAT WHAT WE E, DOI DOI 10.1037/10291-000
[8]   Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2000, 15 (02) :173-189
[9]   Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 29 (01) :72-90
[10]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI