Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition

被引:143
作者
Johnson, CK
Doran, JW
Duke, HR
Wienhold, BJ
Eskridge, KM
Shanahan, JF
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, USDA ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, USDA ARS, AERC, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2001.1829
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Traditional sampling methods are inadequate for assessing the interrelated physical, chemical, and biological soil properties responsible for variations in agronomic yield and ecological potentials across a landscape. Recent advances in computers, global positioning systems, and large-scale sensors offer new opportunities for mapping heterogeneous patterns in soil condition. We evaluated field-scale apparent electrical conductivity (EC.) mapping for delineating soil properties correlated with productivity and ecological properties. A contiguous section of farmland (250 ha), managed as eight fields in a no-till winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-corn (Zea mays L.)-millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)-fallow rotation, was EC. mapped (approximate to 0- to 30-cm depth). A geo-referenced soil-sampling scheme separated each field into four EC. classes that were sampled (0- to 7.5- and 7.5- to 30-cm depths) in triplicate. Soil physical parameters (bulk density, moisture content, and percentage clay), chemical parameters (total and particulate organic matter [POM], total C and N, extractable P, laboratory-measured electrical conductivity [EC1:1], and pH), biological parameters (microbial biomass C [MBC] and N [MBN], and potentially mineralizable N), and surface residue mass were significantly different among EC. classes (P less than or equal to 0.06) at one or both depths (0-7.5 and G-30 cm). Bulk density, percentage clay, EC1:1, and pH were positively correlated with EC.; all other soil parameters and surface residue mass were negatively correlated. Field-scale EC. classification delimits distinct zones of soil condition, providing an effective basis for soil sampling. Potential uses include assessing temporal impacts of management on soil condition and managing spatial variation in soil-condition and yield-potential through precision agriculture and site-specific management.
引用
收藏
页码:1829 / 1837
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] QUANTIFICATION OF THE EFFECT OF SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER CONTENT ON SOIL PRODUCTIVITY
    BAUER, A
    BLACK, AL
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (01) : 185 - 193
  • [2] DETERMINATION OF TOTAL, ORGANIC, AND AVAILABLE FORMS OF PHOSPHORUS IN SOILS
    BRAY, RH
    KURTZ, LT
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE, 1945, 59 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [3] Cambardella CA., 2001, Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon, P349
  • [4] Field-scale mapping of surface soil organic carbon using remotely sensed imagery
    Chen, F
    Kissel, DE
    West, LT
    Adkins, W
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (02) : 746 - 753
  • [5] COOK CW, 1986, RANGE RES
  • [6] DOLITTLE J, 1995, SOIL SURV HORIZ, V36, P86
  • [7] Doran J.W., 1996, Methods for assessing soil quality, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSASPECPUB49.C2
  • [8] EIGENBERG RA, 2002, IN PRESS AGR ECOSYST
  • [9] *ERDAS, 1997, ERDAS FIELD GUID, P225
  • [10] Francis D. D., 1997, Precision agriculture '97. Volume I. Spatial variability in soil and crop. Papers presented at the First European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Warwick University, UK, 7-10 September 1997., P119