Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus

被引:54
作者
Bond, WJ [1 ]
Maze, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
dioecy; plants; Proteaceae; sexual dimorphism; sexual selection;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006581412580
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The evolutionary causes of sexual dimorphism in plants have not been as widely studied as in animals and the importance of sexual selection in causing dimorphism remains controversial. Sexual selection is most obvious when it favours the evolution of a trait which enhances mating success at the expense of decreased viability. We studied the relationship between floral display (number of inflorescences), pollinator attraction and plant survival in a dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus. Pollinator attraction, measured as the number of insect pollinators, increased linearly with floral display in males. However, males with extravagant displays had a higher probability of dying. Our data suggest that male plants are undergoing selection on floral display for increased mating success counterbalanced by selection against plants with extravagant displays. Seed set in females did not increase with floral display, except at very low inflorescence numbers. Nor was female survival correlated with floral display. Because inflorescences are terminal in the species, selection for more inflorescences in males causes increased ramification, thinner terminal branches and smaller leaves. Thus vegetative dimorphism in this species appears to be caused by selection for extravagant floral display in males, but not females. Limits to dimorphism are imposed by survival costs of elaborate display.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[2]  
BAWA KS, 1990, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V11, P15
[3]   SPATIAL SEGREGATION OF THE SEXES OF DIOECIOUS PLANTS [J].
BIERZYCHUDEK, P ;
ECKHART, V .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 132 (01) :34-43
[4]   ALLOMETRY AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN LEAF SIZE [J].
BOND, WJ ;
MIDGLEY, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 131 (06) :901-910
[5]   FIRE LIFE-HISTORIES AND THE SEEDS OF CHAOS [J].
BOND, WJ ;
MAZE, K ;
DESMET, P .
ECOSCIENCE, 1995, 2 (03) :252-260
[6]  
BOND WJ, 1984, J ECOL, V72, P209, DOI 10.2307/2260014
[7]   PRESCRIBED BURNING AS A CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICE - A CASE-HISTORY FROM THE CEDERBERG MOUNTAINS, CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH-AFRICA [J].
BROWN, PJ ;
MANDERS, PT ;
BANDS, DP ;
KRUGER, FJ ;
ANDRAG, RH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1991, 56 (02) :133-150
[8]  
BURD M, 1994, BOT REV, V60, P83, DOI 10.1007/BF02856594
[9]  
Charlesworth D, 1987, EVOLUTION SEX ITS CO, P317
[10]   SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND COST OF REPRODUCTION IN THE DIOECIOUS SHRUB LINDERA BENZOIN (LAURACEAE) [J].
CIPOLLINI, ML ;
WHIGHAM, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1994, 81 (01) :65-75