Three Faces of the State and the Nonprofit Sector

被引:8
作者
Desai, Uday C. [1 ]
Snavely, Keith [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Sch Publ Adm, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] So Illinois Univ, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
government; market; nonprofits; policy domains; job training; foster care; TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT; SERVICES; MARKET; POLICY; ORGANIZATIONS; PRIVATIZATION; STRATEGIES; AGENCIES; CULTURE; FORMS;
D O I
10.1177/0095399711432276
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Recent changes in the U.S. nonprofit sector reflect the influence of market-based public policies and values. In this article, the authors suggest a framework to assess the effects of these policies and values on nonprofit sector characteristics. They propose three models of the state along with three corresponding models of the nonprofit sector. Using recent implementation of market-based policies in two policy domains, foster care and job training, they find that the market-based policies have significantly altered nonprofit behavior and structure. They conclude with suggestions for research using their models of the state and the nonprofit sector.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 984
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? [J].
Alexander, J ;
Nank, R ;
Stivers, C .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 1999, 28 (04) :452-475
[2]  
American Heritage Dictionary, 1988, AM HERITAGE DICT
[3]  
Bakke E., 1969, MISSION MANPOWER POL
[4]  
Buck M., 2000, PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTU, P1
[5]   POLICY DOMAINS - ORGANIZATION, CULTURE, AND POLICY OUTCOMES [J].
BURSTEIN, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1991, 17 :327-350
[6]  
Clague Ewan., 1976, MANPOWER POLICIES PR
[7]   The role of tax exemption in a competitive health care market [J].
Colombo, John D. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2006, 31 (03) :623-642
[8]  
Congressional Quarterly, 1982, C Q ALMANAC, V38, P39
[9]  
Cooper P.J., 2003, Governing by contract: Challenges and opportunities for public managers
[10]  
D'Amico R., 2001, EVALUATION INDIVIDUA