Optimal Formation Reconfiguration Control of Multiple UCAVs Using Improved Particle Swarm Optimization

被引:43
作者
Duan, Hai-bin [1 ]
Ma, Guan-jun [1 ,2 ]
Luo, De-lin [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Automat Sci & Elect Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Univ, Prov Key Lab Informat Proc Technol, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Ctr Syst & Control, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
uninhabited combat air vehicles; particle swarm optimization; control parameterization and time discretization; optimal formation reconfiguration;
D O I
10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60179-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Optimal formation reconfiguration control of multiple Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs) is a complicated global optimum problem. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a population based stochastic optimization technique inspired by social behaviour of bird flocking or fish schooling. PSO can achieve better results in a faster, cheaper way compared with other bio-inspired computational methods, and there are few parameters to adjust in PSO. In this paper, we propose an improved PSO model for solving the optimal formation reconfiguration control problem for multiple UCAVs. Firstly, the Control Parameterization and Time Discretization (CPTD) method is designed in detail. Then, the mutation strategy and a special mutation-escape operator are adopted in the improved PSO model to make particles explore the search space more efficiently. The proposed strategy can produce a large speed value dynamically according to the variation of the speed, which makes the algorithm explore the local and global minima thoroughly at the same time. Series experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the optimal formation reconfiguration control problem for multiple UCAVs.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 347
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Blake W., 1998, P AIAA NAV GUID CONT, P476
  • [2] An agent-based simulation for multi-UAVs coordinative sensing
    Chen, Yee Ming
    Chang, Shu Hao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2008, 1 (02) : 269 - 284
  • [3] Chichka D. F., 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304), P2463, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1999.831295
  • [4] Coello CAC, 2004, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V8, P256, DOI [10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067, 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067]
  • [5] DARGAN JL, 1992, P AIAA GUID NAV CONT, P838
  • [6] Eberhart R., 1995, MHS 95 P 6 INT S MIC, DOI DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
  • [7] Fierro R, 2001, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1065, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2001.981026
  • [8] FU GJ, 2006, COMPUTER ENG APPL, V13, P48
  • [9] Furukawa T, 2003, 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS I-III, PROCEEDINGS, P259
  • [10] Time-subminimal trajectory planning for discrete non-linear systems
    Furukawa, T
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 34 (03) : 219 - 243