Serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1: an improvement over other simple indices of insulin sensitivity in the assessment of subjects with normal glucose tolerance

被引:15
作者
Borai, Anwar [1 ]
Livingstone, Callum [1 ,2 ]
Zarif, Hawazen [3 ]
Ferns, Gordon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[3] King Khalid Natl Guard Hosp, Dept Med, Jeddah 21491, Saudi Arabia
关键词
HOMEOSTASIS MODEL ASSESSMENT; MINIMAL MODEL; CLAMP TECHNIQUE; SINGLE-SAMPLE; RESISTANCE; IGFBP-1; HOMA;
D O I
10.1258/acb.2008.008160
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Insulin resistance is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. It can be assessed using complex reference techniques, such as clamp or frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT). Therefore, simple indices derived from fasting insulin and glucose concentrations have been proposed. The aim of this study is to assess fasting serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) as a simple index of insulin sensitivity compared with other simple indices and FSIVGTT. Methods: Fasting serum IGFBP-1, fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-1R), quantitative insulin check index (QUICKI), fasting glucose to insulin ratio (FGIR), Raynaud and insulin glycaemic index (ISI-gly) were correlated with FSIVGTT (Si) in 22 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and nine with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Results: In NGT individuals, IGFBP-1 correlated more strongly with Si than did any other index both before (r = 0.76) and after (r = 0.79) natural logarithm (In) transformation. In subjects with IFG, IGFBP-1 was weakly correlated with Si before and after In-transformation (r = 0.55, r = 0.56, respectively), but ISI-gly was the index most strongly correlated with Si (r = 0.77, r = 0.85, respectively). Conclusions: In subjects with NGT, fasting serum IGFBP-1 could be used as a simple reliable marker of insulin sensitivity. For more accurate estimation of insulin sensitivity in normal subjects and those with IFG, In-transformation is preferred over raw data.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   Minimal model of glucose metabolism: Modified equations and its application in the study of insulin sensitivity in obese subjects [J].
Araujo-Vilar, D ;
Rega-Liste, CA ;
Garcia-Estevez, DA ;
Sarmiento-Escalona, F ;
Mosquera-Tallon, V ;
Cabezas-Cerrato, J .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1998, 39 (02) :129-141
[4]   Insulin sensitivity indices calculated from basal and OGTT-induced insulin, glucose, and FFA levels [J].
Belfiore, F ;
Iannello, S ;
Volpicelli, G .
MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 1998, 63 (02) :134-141
[5]   EQUIVALENCE OF THE INSULIN SENSITIVITY INDEX IN MAN DERIVED BY THE MINIMAL MODEL METHOD AND THE EUGLYCEMIC GLUCOSE CLAMP [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
PRAGER, R ;
VOLUND, A ;
OLEFSKY, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1987, 79 (03) :790-800
[6]   Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity - Studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [J].
Bonora, E ;
Saggiani, F ;
Targher, G ;
Zenere, MB ;
Alberiche, M ;
Monauni, T ;
Bonadonna, RC ;
Muggeo, M .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (01) :57-63
[7]   The biochemical assessment of insulin resistance [J].
Borai, Anwar ;
Livingstone, Callum ;
Ferns, Gordon A. A. .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 44 :324-342
[8]  
Boston Ray C, 2003, Diabetes Technol Ther, V5, P1003, DOI 10.1089/152091503322641060
[9]  
BRISMAR K, 1993, GROWTH REGULAT, V3, P98
[10]   Epidemiology of the insulin-like growth factor system in three ethnic groups [J].
Cruickshank, JK ;
Heald, AH ;
Anderson, S ;
Cade, JE ;
Sampayo, J ;
Riste, LK ;
Greenhalgh, A ;
Taylor, W ;
Fraser, W ;
White, A ;
Gibson, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 154 (06) :504-513