Development of a new seizure severity questionnaire: initial reliability and validity testing

被引:69
作者
Cramer, JA
Baker, GA
Jacoby, A
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] Walton Ctr Neurol & Neurosurg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Primary Care, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
epilepsy; seizures; aura; ictal; post-ictal; severity;
D O I
10.1016/S0920-1211(02)00003-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This report describes the initial steps for development of a new scale to assess seizure severity as a treatment response. Methods: Standard methodology was used to develop the test instrument. Item generation was performed by selecting items from other questionnaires, and asking patients and epileptologists about seizure components. Face and content validity were assessed in a pilot study with patients and observers. The questionnaire was formatted as a structured interview for a reliability study. Construct validity was assessed with three existing questionnaires. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were performed as two independent ratings on one day, and one re-interview. Results: Based on item generation and pilot testing (33 patients, 28 observers), the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) was organized into warning, activity-movement, and recovery (cognitive, emotional, and physical aspects) stages of seizures. Questions reviewed duration, severity, bothersomeness and overall ratings, and the most bothersome aspect of seizures. The mean SSQ Summary Score was 5.78 +/- 3.24, inter-rater reliability was 0.76 (N = 91), and test-retest reliability was 0.74 (N = 63). Construct validity showed statistically significant correlations with other scales. Conclusion: This study has explored the psychometric properties of the SSQ for face and content validity, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The Summary Score reliably represents the major components of seizures. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SEIZURE SEVERITY SCALE AS AN OUTCOME MEASURE IN EPILEPSY [J].
BAKER, GA ;
SMITH, DF ;
DEWEY, M ;
MORROW, J ;
CRAWFORD, PM ;
CHADWICK, DW .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1991, 8 (03) :245-251
[2]   Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale revisited [J].
Baker, GA ;
Smith, DF ;
Jacoby, A ;
Hayes, JA ;
Chadwick, DW .
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 1998, 7 (03) :201-205
[3]   Assessment of Seizure Severity with Adjunctive Lamotrigine Therapy: Results from a US Observational Study [J].
Bryant-Comstock, Lynda ;
Scott-Lennox, Jane ;
Lennox, Richard .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 2 (02) :152-157
[4]   Quantitative assessment of seizure severity for clinical trials: A review of approaches to seizure components [J].
Cramer, JA ;
French, J .
EPILEPSIA, 2001, 42 (01) :119-129
[5]   A METHOD OF QUANTIFICATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUG-THERAPY [J].
CRAMER, JA ;
SMITH, DB ;
MATTSON, RH ;
ESCUETA, AVD ;
COLLINS, JF ;
BROWNE, TR ;
CRILL, WE ;
HOMAN, RW ;
MAYERSDORF, A ;
MCCUTCHEN, CB ;
MCNAMARA, JO ;
ROSENTHAL, NP ;
TREIMAN, DM ;
WILDER, BJ ;
WILLIAMSON, PD .
NEUROLOGY, 1983, 33 (03) :26-37
[6]  
CRAMER JA, 1993, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V255, P55
[7]   THE CHALFONT SEIZURE SEVERITY SCALE [J].
DUNCAN, JS ;
SANDER, JWAS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 54 (10) :873-876
[8]  
FCRAMER JA, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROL, V14, P225
[9]   The National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale: A further development of the Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale [J].
ODonoghue, MF ;
Duncan, JS ;
Sander, JWAS .
EPILEPSIA, 1996, 37 (06) :563-571
[10]   Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a revised scoring system for the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale [J].
Scott-Lennox, J ;
Bryant-Comstock, L ;
Lennox, R ;
Baker, GA .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2001, 44 (01) :53-63