Capacity of endometrial thickness measurement to diagnose endometrial carcinoma in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:114
作者
Breijer, M. C. [1 ,2 ]
Peeters, J. A. H. [3 ]
Opmeer, B. C. [4 ]
Clark, T. J. [5 ]
Verheijen, R. H. M. [6 ]
Mol, B. W. J. [1 ]
Timmermans, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dordrecht, Netherlands
[3] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Clin Res Unit, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Birmingham Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
asymptomatic postmenopausal women; atypical hyperplasia; endometrial carcinoma; endometrial thickness; meta-analysis; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS; PROGESTERONE CHALLENGE; REPRODUCTIVE FACTORS; MENOPAUSAL WOMEN; OBESE WOMEN; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/uog.12306
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 [声学];
摘要
Objectives Measurement of endometrial thickness is an important tool in the assessment of women with postmenopausal bleeding, but the role of endometrial thickness measurement by ultrasound in asymptomatic women is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine: (1) the normal endometrial thickness measured by ultrasonography, (2) the prevalence of serious endometrial pathology and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial thickness measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) for diagnosing premalignant and malignant endometrial disease in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Methods A MEDLINE and EMBASE search (from inception to January 2011) was performed. Articles reporting on endometrial thickness measurement in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women not using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) were selected. Endometrial thickness and the prevalence of endometrial (pre)malignancies were recorded. If possible, 2 x 2 tables were extracted. Results Thirty-two studies reporting on 11?100 women were included. The estimated mean endometrial thickness was 2.9 mm (95% CI, 2.63.3 mm). The pooled estimated prevalences of endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia were 0.62% (95% CI, 0.420.82%) and 0.59% (95% CI, 0.220.96%), respectively. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of TVS endometrial thickness measurement in the prediction of endometrial carcinoma were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.191.00) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.230.95) for a 5-mm cut-off and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.040.85) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.920.96) for a 6-mm cut-off. Conclusions The results from this systematic review do not justify the use of endometrial thickness as a screening test for endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women not using HRT. Copyright (C) 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 629
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]
Anderson KE, 2001, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V10, P611
[2]
ANDOLF E, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P936
[3]
[Anonymous], 1995, Gynaecol Endosc
[4]
Transvaginal ultrasonography and the progestogen challenge test in postmenopausal endometrial evaluation [J].
Bortoletto, CCR ;
Baracat, EC ;
Goncalves, WJ ;
Lima, GR ;
Stavale, JN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 58 (03) :293-298
[5]
Differential diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding [J].
Brenner, PF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (03) :766-769
[6]
Buccoliero A M, 2003, Pathologica, V95, P179
[7]
Cohen MA, 1999, MENOPAUSE, V6, P68
[8]
Gouveia DAD, 2007, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V53, P344, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302007000400021
[9]
Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[10]
The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrial abnormalities [J].
Dijkhuizen, FPHLJ ;
Brolmann, HAM ;
Potters, AE ;
Bongers, MY ;
Heintz, APM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (03) :345-349