An investigation of factors predictive of independence in transfers and ambulation after hip fracture

被引:45
作者
Duke, RG
Keating, JL
机构
[1] Dandenong Hosp, Physiotherapy Dept, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2002年 / 83卷 / 02期
关键词
early ambulation; hip fractures; length of stay; rehabilitation; surgery; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2002.27463
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the predictive value of measurements of mobility on the second day postsurgery with previously established outcome predictors after hip fracture and to establish a statistical model for the prediction of independence in transfers and ambulation. Design: Prospective, validation cohort study. Setting: Primary care center. Patients: Two samples of 50 patients admitted with primary diagnosis of hip fracture. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Independence in transfers and ambulation within 2 weeks of surgery. Predictor variables considered were age, mental state, prefracture mobility, and 4 measurements of transfers and ambulation on the second day postsurgery. Results: In bivariate logistic regression analysis, all variables were significant predictors. In multiple logistic regression analysis, only distance walked and assistance required in transferring supine to sitting on day 2 postsurgery were significant. The multiple logistic regression model produced from the analysis had an outcome classification accuracy of 88% when tested on an independent sample. Conclusions: Measurements of mobility on day 2 postsurgery are significant and reliable predictors of independence in transfers and ambulation. Further consideration of the variables age, mental state, and prefracture mobility do not appear to improve the accuracy of the prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 164
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   AMBULATION OUTCOMES AFTER HIP FRACTURE [J].
BARNES, B .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1984, 64 (03) :317-323
[2]   FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER HIP FRACTURE [J].
BARNES, B ;
DUNOVAN, K .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (11) :1675-1679
[3]   PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF HIP FRACTURE TREATMENT - 856 CASES FOLLOWED FOR 4 MONTHS IN THE NETHERLANDS AND SWEDEN [J].
BERGLUNDRODEN, M ;
SWIERSTRA, BA ;
WINGSTRAND, H ;
THORNGREN, KG .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (03) :287-294
[4]  
Bohannon W, 1990, TOP GERIATR REHABIL, V6, P51
[5]  
CEDER L, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P185
[6]  
CEDER L, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P173
[7]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND PROGRESS FOR AMBULATION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS AFTER HIP FRACTURE [J].
CHENG, CL ;
LAU, S ;
HUI, PW ;
CHOW, SP ;
PUN, WK ;
NG, J ;
LEONG, JCY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1989, 68 (05) :230-233
[8]   Regaining functional independence in the acute care setting following hip fracture [J].
Guccione, AA ;
Fagerson, TL ;
Anderson, JJ .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (08) :818-826
[9]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st
[10]  
HILL T, 1993, EVALUATION ORTHOGERI