Impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on surgical management of melanoma patients

被引:39
作者
Bastiaannet, E
Oyen, WJG
Meijer, S
Hoekstra, OS
Wobbes, T
Jager, PL
Hoekstra, HJ
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Nucl Med & Positron Emiss Tomog Ctr, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Med, Nucl Med & Positron Emiss Tomog Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5174
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several studies have shown adequate sensitivity and specificity of [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the detection of metastases from melanoma, but few have addressed its impact on treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of FDG-PET on treatment of melanoma in three Dutch university medical centres. Methods: The medical records of 257 patients were reviewed. The indications for FDG-PET and findings were recorded. Unexpected findings of suspected (pre)malignant tumours other than melanoma were assessed. Treatment plans before and after FDG-PET were recorded and analysed to evaluate changes in disease management. Results: Most scans (71(.)2 per cent) were requested for staging, mainly to detect distant metastases in patients with stage III disease. Overall, 56 patients (21(.)8 per cent) were upstaged as a result of PET. In 44 patients (17(.)1 percent) treatment was changed, usually from surgery to systemic treatment m patients with stage III disease. Unexpected tumours were detected (mainly colorectal) in 11 patients (4(.)3 per cent). Conclusion: FDG-PET is most valuable in patients with stage III melanoma for detection of distant metastases and identification of candidates for surgery and/or systemic treatment. Unexpected FDG-PET findings should not be disregarded, as (pre)malignant, clinically relevant, tumours may be identified.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Positron emission tomography imaging in melanoma and lymphoma [J].
Abella-Columna, E ;
Valk, PE .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 37 (02) :129-139
[2]   Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma [J].
Acland, KM ;
Healy, C ;
Calonje, E ;
O'Doherty, M ;
Nunan, T ;
Page, C ;
Higgins, E ;
Russell-Jones, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (10) :2674-2678
[3]   The value of positron emission tomography scanning in the detection of subclinical metastatic melanoma [J].
Acland, KM ;
O'Doherty, MJ ;
Russell-Jones, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 42 (04) :606-611
[4]   Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: Histopathologic comparison [J].
Agress, H ;
Cooper, BZ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :417-422
[5]   CUTANEOUS MELANOMA - PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT RESULTS WORLDWIDE [J].
BALCH, CM .
SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 8 (06) :400-414
[6]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF MALIGNANT-MELANOMA [J].
BOYLE, P ;
MAISONNEUVE, P ;
DORE, JF .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 51 (03) :523-547
[7]  
Brix G, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1614
[8]  
DAHLBOM M, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P1191
[9]   Positron emission tomography in the detection and management of metastatic melanoma [J].
Damian, DL ;
Fulham, MJ ;
Thompson, E ;
Thompson, JF .
MELANOMA RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (04) :325-329
[10]   A prospective analysis of positron emission tomography and conventional imaging for detection of stage IV metastatic melanoma in patients undergoing metastasectomy [J].
Finkelstein, SE ;
Carrasquillo, JA ;
Hoffman, JM ;
Galen, B ;
Choyke, P ;
White, DE ;
Rosenberg, SA ;
Sherry, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :731-738