The Parkinson-control study: A 1-year randomized, double-blind trial comparing piribedil (150 mg/day) with bromocriptine (25 mg/day) in early combination with levodopa in Parkinson's disease

被引:44
作者
Castro-Caldas, A
Delwaide, P
Jost, W
Merello, M
Williams, A
Lamberti, P
Aguilar, M
Del Signore, S
Cesaro, P
机构
[1] CHU Henri Mondor, Serv Neurol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[2] Inst Rech Int Servier, F-92415 Courbevoie, France
[3] Univ Studi, Neurol Clin, Terrassa, Spain
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
[5] Fleni, Inst Invest Neurol Raul Carrera Montaneses, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[6] Deutsch Klin Diagnost, D-6200 Wiesbaden, Germany
[7] CHR Citadelle, Serv Neurol, Liege, Belgium
[8] Univ Catolica Portuguesa, Inst Ciencias Saude, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
dopamine agonists; piribedil; levodopa; Parkinson's disease; bromocriptine;
D O I
10.1002/mds.20750
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Dopamine agonists have been recommended as early treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), alone or combined with levodopa. Piribedil is a non-ergot selective D-2/D-3 agonist with alpha(2) antagonist properties shown to be effective in the treatment of PD. This 12-month international, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to assess the efficacy of piribedil 150 mg versus bromocriptine 25 mg, in early combination with levodopa in Stage I to III PD patients. Motor efficacy was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III, Items 18-31) as improvement from baseline. Response rate was defined as a 30% improvement. Among the 425 randomly assigned patients. 178 were also included in a substudy on cognitive follow-up evaluated by a dysexecutive syndrome oriented battery. A relevant improvement in UPDRS III over the 12-month Study duration was observed both in the piribedil and bromocriptine groups (-7.9 +/- 9.7 points from baseline versus -8.0 +/- 9.5; not significant [n.s.]) with a response rate of 58.4% and 55.3% (n.s.). respectively. Piribedil and bromocriptine resulted in similar improvement on all UPDRS III subscores. Piribedil patients required less levodopa dose increase than those on bromocriptine. Cognitive performance remained generally unchanged in both groups, with a significant effect of piribedil limited to the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. An overall good tolerability of piribedil was observed. Early combination of piribedil 150 mg with levodopa resulted in significant long-term improvement of all motor symptoms in PD patients insufficiently controlled by levodopa alone. Taking into account both efficacy and acceptability in the long-term, piribedil proved in this bromocriptine controlled study to be an effective and safe treatment for PD. (C) 2005 Movement Disorder Society.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 509
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ALLAIN H, 2001, PARKINSONIAM RELAT S, V7
[2]  
Bossant M. J., 2003, European Journal of Neurology, V10, P166
[3]   INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL CUES AND THE CONTROL OF ATTENTION IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
BROWN, RG ;
MARSDEN, CD .
BRAIN, 1988, 111 :323-345
[4]   A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa [J].
Brunt, ER ;
Brooks, DJ ;
Korczyn, AD ;
Montastruc, JL ;
Stocchi, F .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2002, 109 (04) :489-502
[5]   PIRIBEDIL (ET-495) IN TREATMENT OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE COMBINED WITH AMANTADINE OR LEVODOPA [J].
CALLAGHAN, N ;
FITZPATRICK, E ;
OMAHONY, JB .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1975, 52 (03) :179-186
[6]  
*CPMP, 1998, CPMPEWP56395 EMEA
[7]  
CPMP, 2003, CPMPEWP286399 EMEA
[8]  
*CPMP, 2000, CPMPEWP48299 EMEA
[9]   Cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease [J].
Dubois, B ;
Pillon, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 244 (01) :2-8
[10]   Rivastigmine for dementia associated with Parkinson's disease [J].
Emre, M ;
Aarsland, D ;
Albanese, A ;
Byrne, EJ ;
Deuschl, G ;
De Deyn, PP ;
Durif, F ;
Kulisevsky, J ;
van Laar, T ;
Lees, A ;
Poewe, W ;
Robillard, A ;
Rosa, MM ;
Wolters, E ;
Quarg, P ;
Tekin, S ;
Lane, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (24) :2509-2518