Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates

被引:97
作者
Ewers, Robert M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa, Panama
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2006年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
afforestation; deforestation; economic development; forest cover; GDP; plantation;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent work on global patterns of deforestation has shown that countries with high per capita GDP or low remaining forest cover are more likely to be experiencing afforestation than deforestation. Here, I show that the relationship is more complex than previously described, because the effect of one variable is dependent upon the value of the other. As a result, high-income nations exhibit the opposite response to disappearing forest cover than low-income nations. In an analysis of 103 countries, I found that high-income countries with low forest cover have the highest rates of afforestation, typically through the establishment of new plantations. In contrast, low-income countries with little forest are more likely to consume that remaining portion at a faster proportional rate than do low-income countries with more forest. Nations with large amounts of forest have approximately equal deforestation rates, regardless of national wealth. These results highlight for the first time that there is a strong interaction between forest cover and economic development that determines rates of forest change among nations. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 169
页数:9
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Projecting large-scale area changes in land use and land cover for terrestrial carbon analyses [J].
Alig, RJ ;
Butler, BJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 33 (04) :443-456
[2]   Could peace be worse than war for Colombia's forests? [J].
Álvarez M.D. .
Environmentalist, 2001, 21 (4) :305-315
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, LUCC REPORT SERIES
[4]   The political economy of resource-driven growth [J].
Auty, RM .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (4-6) :839-846
[5]   Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Bruner, A ;
Cooper, P ;
Costanza, R ;
Farber, S ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M ;
Jefferiss, P ;
Jessamy, V ;
Madden, J ;
Munro, K ;
Myers, N ;
Naeem, S ;
Paavola, J ;
Rayment, M ;
Rosendo, S ;
Roughgarden, J ;
Trumper, K ;
Turner, RK .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :950-953
[6]   Economics of wastelands afforestation in India, a review [J].
Balooni, K .
NEW FORESTS, 2003, 26 (02) :101-136
[7]   Does economic development lead to mangrove loss? A cross-country analysis [J].
Barbier, EB ;
Cox, M .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2003, 21 (04) :418-432
[8]   Frontier expansion and economic development [J].
Barbier, EB .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2005, 23 (02) :286-303
[9]   Agricultural, expansion, resource booms and growth in Latin America: Implications for long-run economic development [J].
Barbier, EB .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (01) :137-157
[10]   The economics of tropical deforestation [J].
Barbier, EB ;
Burgess, JC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2001, 15 (03) :413-433