Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation

被引:126
作者
Berry, PM
Rounsevell, MDA
Harrison, PA
Audsley, E
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Geog, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Silsoe Res Inst, Biomath Grp, Silsoe MK45 4HS, Beds, England
关键词
climate change; farmers; species; vulnerability; adaptation; policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The term vulnerability has been used in a variety of contexts, including climate change impact assessment. In this paper those issues relevant to climate change impacts on agriculture and species are discussed. Outputs from models are used to assess the vulnerability of fanners and species to climate and socio-economic change by estimating their sensitivity and capacity to adapt to external factors as a means of identifying what causes the differences in their vulnerability. The results showed that the vulnerability of both farmers and species is dependent on the scenario under consideration. In agriculture, it is the socio-economic scenarios that particularly lead to different patterns of intensification, extensification and abandonment. For species, vulnerability is more related to the climate change scenarios. In both cases, the adaptation options and potential were associated with the different socio-economic futures and policy intervention. The conceptual linking of the two sectors shows that impacts in the agriculture sector and consequent adaptation could have a significant effect on the adaptation potential of species. This demonstrates the importance of cross-sectoral assessments of vulnerability and highlights the importance of sectoral integration in policy development and implementation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 204
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ACOSTAMICHLIK L, 2000, IHDP UPDATE NEWSLETT, V1, P14
[2]   Adapting to climate change: perspectives across scales [J].
Adger, WN ;
Arnell, NW ;
Tompkins, EL .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :75-76
[3]   Vulnerability of agronomic systems in Bulgaria [J].
Alexandrov, VA .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1997, 36 (1-2) :135-149
[4]   Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning [J].
Annetts, JE ;
Audsley, E .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2002, 53 (09) :933-943
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLIM CHANG 2001 IMP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
[7]  
[Anonymous], OBSERVED IMPACTS GLO
[8]   Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Pearson, RG ;
Thuiller, W ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (09) :1504-1513
[9]   What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? [J].
Audsley, E ;
Pearn, KR ;
Simota, C ;
Cojocaru, G ;
Koutsidou, E ;
Rounsevell, MDA ;
Trnka, M ;
Alexandrov, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2006, 9 (02) :148-162
[10]  
Berry Pam M., 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V11, P15, DOI 10.1078/1617-1381-00030