Boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of water transport through nanotubes

被引:17
作者
Docherty, Stephanie Y. [1 ]
Nicholls, William D. [1 ]
Borg, Matthew K. [1 ]
Lockerby, Duncan A. [2 ]
Reese, Jason M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Warwick, Sch Engn, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Nanofluid dynamics; molecular dynamics; carbon nanotubes; nanomembranes; CONTINUUM; FLOW;
D O I
10.1177/0954406213481760
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
120111 [工业工程];
摘要
This article compares both new and commonly used boundary conditions for generating pressure-driven water flows through carbon nanotubes in molecular dynamics simulations. Three systems are considered: (1) a finite carbon nanotube membrane with streamwise periodicity and gravity'-type Gaussian forcing, (2) a non-periodic finite carbon nanotube membrane with reservoir pressure control, and (3) an infinite carbon nanotube with periodicity and gravity'-type uniform forcing. Comparison between these focuses on the flow behaviour, in particular the mass flow rate and pressure gradient along the carbon nanotube, as well as the radial distribution of water density inside the carbon nanotube. Similar flow behaviour is observed in both membrane systems, with the level of user input required for such simulations found to be largely dependent on the state controllers selected for use in the reservoirs. While System 1 is simple to implement in common molecular dynamics codes, System 2 is more complicated, and the selection of control parameters is less straightforward. A large pressure difference is required between the water reservoirs in these systems to compensate for large pressure losses sustained at the entrance and exit of the nanotube. Despite a simple set-up and a dramatic increase in computational efficiency, the infinite length carbon nanotube in System 3 does not account for these significant inlet and outlet effects, meaning that a much smaller pressure gradient is required to achieve a specified mass flow rate. The infinite tube set-up also restricts natural flow development along the carbon nanotube due to the explicit control of the fluid. Observation of radial density profiles suggests that this results in over-constraint of the water molecules in the tube.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 195
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Molecular Simulation of Water in Carbon Nanotubes [J].
Alexiadis, Alessio ;
Kassinos, Stavros .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2008, 108 (12) :5014-5034
[2]
Allen M. P., 1989, Computer Simulation of Liquids, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00646086
[3]
MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS WITH COUPLING TO AN EXTERNAL BATH [J].
BERENDSEN, HJC ;
POSTMA, JPM ;
VANGUNSTEREN, WF ;
DINOLA, A ;
HAAK, JR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 81 (08) :3684-3690
[4]
Controllers for imposing continuum-to-molecular boundary conditions in arbitrary fluid flow geometries [J].
Borg, Matthew K. ;
Macpherson, Graham B. ;
Reese, Jason M. .
MOLECULAR SIMULATION, 2010, 36 (10) :745-757
[5]
Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination [J].
Corry, Ben .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2008, 112 (05) :1427-1434
[6]
Multiscale modeling of liquids with molecular specificity [J].
De Fabritiis, G. ;
Delgado-Buscalioni, R. ;
Coveney, P. V. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 97 (13)
[7]
Molecular dynamics simulations of transport and separation of carbon dioxide-alkane mixtures in carbon nanopores [J].
Firouzi, M ;
Nezhad, KM ;
Tsotsis, TT ;
Sahimi, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 120 (17) :8172-8185
[8]
Flux boundary conditions in particle simulations [J].
Flekkoy, EG ;
Delgado-Buscalioni, R ;
Coveney, PV .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 72 (02)
[9]
Statistical error in particle simulations of hydrodynamic phenomena [J].
Hadjiconstantinou, NG ;
Garcia, AL ;
Bazant, MZ ;
He, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2003, 187 (01) :274-297
[10]
Investigation of entrance and exit effects on liquid transport through a cylindrical nanopore [J].
Huang, Cunkui ;
Choi, Phillip Y. K. ;
Nandakumar, K. ;
Kostiuk, Larry W. .
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 10 (01) :186-192