Productivity differences across OECD countries in the presence of environmental constraints

被引:61
作者
Arcelus, F
Arocena, P
机构
[1] Univ New Brunswick, Fac Adm, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
[2] Univ Publ Navarra, Navarra, Spain
关键词
data envelopment analysis; productive and environmental efficiency; CO2 emissions control; economic growth;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601942
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to carry out a computational analysis of the tradeoffs between a good Output and the CO2 emissions or bad Output that is often created as it by-product of the production process. The efficiency of this process is computed through a series of DEA formulations, related to the two outputs. One formulation considers the strategy or minimizing the Pollution level produced for the generation of a given good-output level. Another seeks the maximum good-output production for a set bad-output level. A mixed strategy looks for simultaneous increases in the good output and decreases in CO2 emissions. A fourth ignores altogether the presence of the bad output. The empirical analysis illustrates the feasibility of achieving productivity growth and pollution decreases. It also identifies country trends for the 1970-1990 period in the production of good and bad outputs of 14 OECD countries. These trends resemble quite closely the strategies described in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:1352 / 1362
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Convergence and productive efficiency in fourteen OECD countries: A non-parametric frontier approach [J].
Arcelus, FJ ;
Arocena, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 66 (02) :105-117
[2]   Economic growth and CO2 emissions in the European Union [J].
Bengochea-Morancho, A ;
Higón-Tamarit, F ;
Martínez-Zarzoso, I .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :165-172
[3]  
Cavlovic T. A., 2000, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V29, P32
[4]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[5]  
Cole MA., 2000, J INT TRADE ECON DEV, V9, P339, DOI [10.1080/09638190050086186, DOI 10.1080/09638190050086186]
[6]  
Cooper W.W., 2000, Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software
[7]  
FARE R, 1989, REV ECON STAT, V71, P90
[8]   Shadow pricing of good and bad commodities [J].
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (03) :584-590
[9]  
FARE R, 1993, REV ECON STAT, V75, P274
[10]  
Fare R., 2004, NEW DIRECTIONS EFFIC