Clear benefit of mycophenolate mofetil-based triple therapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after living donor renal transplantations

被引:25
作者
Kim, YS [1 ]
Moon, JI [1 ]
Kim, SI [1 ]
Park, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199908270-00023
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. According to a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical studies concerning the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) proved superior to azathioprine or placebo in conjunction with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. MMF-treated patients showed reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection, similar graft survival, and better graft function over 12 months. However, the multicenter trials did not include the Asian recipients of Living donor kidneys. Methods. To assess the efficacy of MMF as the third component of a triple therapy in addition to CsA-Neoral and steroids in living donor renal transplantation recipients in Asians, a total of 100 recipients were randomized to receive CsA-Neoral and steroids (control group, n=50), or MMF-based triple therapy (1.0 g of MMF twice daily from postoperative day 2, MMF group, n=50). The dosing plan for Neoral and steroids was essentially same between groups. During 12 months of follow-up, we compared the incidence of acute rejection, adverse events such as infections, and la-month actual graft and patient survival. Results. The graft and patient survival at 1 year was excellent in both groups: 96/98% in the control group and 98/100% in the MMF group, respectively. MMF significantly reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of acute rejection (34% in the control group vs. 14% in the MMF group), cumulative incidence of acute rejection episodes (46% vs. 16%), and requirement of antilymphocyte antibody (21.7% vs. 12.5%). In the MMF group, viral infection such as herpes tester or chicken pox was more prevalent than in the control group. Conclusions. Like cadaveric renal transplantation, this open clinical trial showed MMF to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection if used in conjunction with Neoral and steroids after living donor renal transplantation in Asian ethnicity.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 581
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CECKA JM, 1992, TRANSPLANT P, V24, P1431
[2]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[3]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection [J].
Halloran, P ;
Mathew, T ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Groth, C ;
Hooftman, L ;
Barker, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) :39-47
[4]  
Katznelson S, 1996, CLIN TRANS, P379
[5]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[6]   POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF PRETRANSPLANT IMMUNE RESPONDER STATUS TO RENAL-ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL DIFFERENCES OF BLACK VERSUS WHITE RECIPIENTS [J].
KERMAN, RH ;
KIMBALL, PM ;
VANBUREN, CT ;
LEWIS, RM ;
KAHAN, BD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 51 (02) :338-342
[7]  
PARK K, 1998, CLIN TRANS, P149
[8]  
Schweitzer EJ, 1998, TRANSPLANTATION, V65, P242
[9]   MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS [J].
SOLLINGER, HW .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (03) :225-232
[10]   Single center analysis of mycophenolate mofetil and neoral/prednisone therapy for prophylaxis of rejection in African-American and Caucasian transplant recipients [J].
Weber, M ;
Ketchum, RJ ;
Sellers, M ;
Aradhye, S ;
Deng, S ;
Grossman, R ;
Shaw, L ;
Naji, A ;
Barker, C ;
Brayman, KL .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) :338-339