The 40-mg dose of eletriptan: comparative efficacy and tolerability versus sumatriptan 100 mg

被引:14
作者
Diener, HC
Ryan, R
Sun, W
Hettiarachchi, J
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Ryan Headache Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词
acute treatment; eletriptan; headache; migraine; sumatriptan; triptan;
D O I
10.1046/j.1351-5101.2003.00730.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Meta-analysis provides valuable information regarding relative efftcacies of triptans, but head-to-head comparator studies remain the gold standard. Three similar head-to-head trials comparing eletriptan 40 mg (E40) with sumatriptan 100 mg (S100) provide a rare opportunity and sufficient power, for robust comparisons of efficacy. Data were combined from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-dose, first-attack acute migraine treatment studies comparing E40 (n = 1132), S100 (n = 1129), and placebo (n = 645). The primary outcome was headache response at 2 h. Secondary outcomes included headache response at 1 h, pain-free and functional responses, and sustained headache and pain-free responses. Odds ratios were calculated for summary estimates of probability of response. There were higher headache response rates with eletriptan versus sumatriptan at 2 h (67% vs. 57%; P < 0.0001) and 1 h (34% vs. 26%; P < 0.0001). Eletriptan also had higher 2 h pain-free (35% vs. 25%; P < 0.0001) and functional responses (67% vs. 58%; P < 0.0001). Sustained headache (42%) and pain-free (22%) response rates were higher for eletriptan versus sumatriptan (34%, P < 0.0001; 15%, P < 0.0001). The probability of response for eletriptan versus sumatriptan ranged from 36% higher (relief of nausea) to 64% higher (sustained pain-free rate). Combined analysis demonstrates that E40 has superior efficacy versus S100 across all clinically relevant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 134
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
COUCH JR, 2003, AM HEAD SOC ANN M JU
[2]   Almotriptan is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for migraine pain:: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [J].
Dowson, AJ ;
Massiou, H ;
Laínez, JM ;
Cabarrocas, X .
CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (06) :453-461
[3]  
Dowson Andrew J, 2002, Expert Opin Pharmacother, V3, P993
[4]   Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Phillips, AN .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7121) :1533-1537
[5]  
Engels EA, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1707, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::AID-SIM491>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-P
[7]   Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in acute migraine treatment:: a meta-analysis of 53 trials [J].
Ferrari, MD ;
Roon, KI ;
Lipton, RB ;
Goadsby, PJ .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9294) :1668-1675
[8]   A comparative trial of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan for the acute oral treatment of migraine [J].
Gallagher, RM ;
Dennish, G ;
Spierings, ELH ;
Chitra, R .
HEADACHE, 2000, 40 (02) :119-128
[9]   Comparison of the efficacy of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan: issues in migraine trial design [J].
Geraud, G ;
Olesen, J ;
Pfaffenrath, V ;
Tfelt-Hansen, P ;
Zupping, R ;
Diener, HC ;
Sweet, R .
CEPHALALGIA, 2000, 20 (01) :30-38
[10]   Tolerability and safety of frovatriptan with short- and long-term use for treatment of migraine and in comparison with sumatriptan [J].
Géraud, G ;
Spierings, ELH ;
Keywood, C .
HEADACHE, 2002, 42 :S93-S99