Multiple-gradient array measurements for multichannel 2D resistivity imaging

被引:209
作者
Dahlin, T
Zhou, B
机构
[1] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Phys, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.3997/1873-0604.2005037
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two-dimensional resistivity imaging using multiple gradient, Wenner and dipole-dipole electrode arrays was carried out at two field sites in Sweden and one in Nicaragua, with the objective of confirming the practical applicability of results obtained with numerical modelling. The results support earlier numerical modelling studies that concluded that the gradient array, using multiple current electrode combinations, has resolution as good as or better than the commonly used Wenner array. The array behaved well in terms of sensitivity to noise at the test sites, and the results obtained generally agree with dipole-dipole array results, although the latter at two of the sites gave resistivities that differed significantly from the other arrays in the deeper parts of the inverted models. A formula proposed for pseudosection plotting works well for data quality assessment, where it can be an advantage to make separate plots for each m-factor (the distance between the midpoints of the current and potential electrode pairs) or for each a-spacing. The gradient array is well suited for multichannel data acquisition, and can significantly increase the speed of data acquisition in the field and at the same time give higher data density, but it is also an attractive option for single-channel data acquisition. The Wenner array, on the other hand, is not suitable for measuring in more than one channel. Compared to the dipole-dipole array, it offers lower sensitivity to noise which may be a major advantage in real data acquisition, and the remote electrode needed for the pole-dipole array is avoided, which is often a significant advantage for field logistics.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 123
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 3 M ENV ENG GEOPHYS
[2]   DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: two pre-excavation surveys [J].
Bernstone, C ;
Dahlin, T ;
Ohlsson, T ;
Hogland, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2000, 39 (3-4) :360-371
[3]   Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modelling [J].
Dahlin, T ;
Loke, MH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 38 (04) :237-249
[4]   A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays [J].
Dahlin, T ;
Zhou, B .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2004, 52 (05) :379-398
[5]  
Dahlin T., 1996, First Break, V14, P275, DOI [10.3997/1365-2397.1996014, DOI 10.3997/1365-2397.1996014]
[6]   MODIFIED PSEUDO-SECTION FOR RESISTIVITY AND IP [J].
EDWARDS, LS .
GEOPHYSICS, 1977, 42 (05) :1020-1036
[7]  
EKSTROM G, 1961, BESKRIVNING KARTBLAD
[8]  
HRADECK P, 1997, ESTUDIO GEOLOGICO RE
[9]  
LEROUX V, 2002, P 8 ENV ENG GEOPH M, P2075
[10]   A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys [J].
Loke, M. H. ;
Acworth, Ian ;
Dahlin, Torleif .
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 34 (03) :182-187