Evaluation of the Modified Jebsen Test of Hand Function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke

被引:44
作者
Bovend'Eerdt, TJH
Dawes, H
Johansen-Berg, H
Wade, DT
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Biol & Mol Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Oxford Ctr Funct Magnet Resonance Imaging Brain, Oxford, England
[4] Oxford Ctr Enablement, Oxford, England
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0269215504cr722oa
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the concurrent validity and test - retest reliability of the Modified Jebsen Test of Hand Function (MJT) and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke (UMAQS). Design: Individuals with acquired neurological disorders were retested within an average of 9.6 days after the first assessment. Setting: Individuals were recruited from two specialist rehabilitation units, members of the Multiple Sclerosis Society and Headway Group. Subjects: Twenty-six individuals with acquired neurological disorders; stroke ( 12), MS ( 7), head injury ( 4), tumour ( 3) with moderate to high functioning upper limbs were recruited for this study. Main outcome measures: Arm function was assessed using the MJT, the UMAQS, the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) and grip strength, calculating the ratio between affected and unaffected arm. Results: The MJT showed good concurrent validity. Pearson's correlation with the NHPT was 0.86 and 0.88, on T1 and T2 respectively. The UMAQS showed no significant correlation with grip strength, the NHPT and the MJT. Test - retest reliability of the MJT was high with a correlation of 0.95, and 95% limits of agreement of 0.02 +/- 0.14. Correlations over time of the dominant hand/nondominant hand of the UMAQS were 0.72 and 0.83, with limits of agreement of - 2.92 +/- 13.28 and 1.73 +/- 11.53. Conclusions: The present study supports the use of the MJT as a measure of gross functional dexterity. More information is needed to evaluate the UMAQS.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF A MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE OF MUSCLE SPASTICITY [J].
BOHANNON, RW ;
SMITH, MB .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (02) :206-207
[4]   Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function [J].
Boissy, P ;
Bourbonnais, D ;
Carlotti, MM ;
Gravel, D ;
Arsenault, BA .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (04) :354-362
[5]  
COOTE S, 2001, PHYS THER REV, V6, P63
[6]   Rationales for improving motor function [J].
Hummelsheim, H .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 1999, 12 (06) :697-701
[7]  
JEBSEN R H, 1969, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, V50, P311
[8]   Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy [J].
Johansen-Berg, H ;
Dawes, H ;
Guy, C ;
Smith, SM ;
Wade, DT ;
Matthews, PM .
BRAIN, 2002, 125 :2731-2742
[9]   The arm motor ability test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living [J].
Kopp, B ;
Kunkel, A ;
Flor, H ;
Platz, T ;
Rose, U ;
Mauritz, KH ;
Gresser, K ;
McCulloch, KL ;
Taub, E .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (06) :615-620
[10]   Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke [J].
Lincoln, NB ;
Parry, RH ;
Vass, CD .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (03) :573-579