A method for improving the management of controversial wetland

被引:34
作者
Merot, P
Hubert-Moy, L
Gascuel-Odoux, C
Clement, B
Durand, P
Baudry, J
Thenail, C
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Sol Agron, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes 2, UMR 6554, CNRS, F-35043 Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes 1, UMR 6553, ECOBIO, CNRS, F-35042 Rennes, France
[4] INRA, SAD Armor, F-35042 Rennes, France
关键词
valley bottom wetland; riparian wetland; agricultural catchment; spatial delineation; methodology; buffer zone;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-004-0391-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Valley bottom wetlands in agricultural landscapes often are neglected in national and regional wetland inventories. Although these areas are small, located in the bottomlands of the headwater catchments, and scattered in the rural landscape, they strongly influence hydrology, water quality, and biodiversity over the whole catchment area. Valley bottom wetlands often are considered as controversial wetlands. Awareness of the functional role of wetlands is increasing, in parallel with their progressive disappearance in intensive farming landscapes. The need to improve tools for controlling wetland management is a primary consideration for decision makers and land users. This article proposes a method for the inventory of valley bottom wetlands. The method is based on the functional analysis of potential, existing, and efficient valley bottom wetlands (the PEEW approach). Several indicators are proposed for checking the validity of such an approach. Potential wetlands are delineated by means of a topographic index using topographic and pedoclimatic criteria computed from a Digital Elevation Model and easily accessible databases. Existing wetlands are identified from observed surface moisture, the presence of specific wetland vegetation, or soil feature criteria. Efficient wetlands are defined through a given function, such as flow or pollutant regulation or biodiversity control. An analysis of areas at the limits between potential, existing, and efficient wetlands highlights land cultivated or drained in the past, which currently represents negotiating areas in which rehabilitation and other intended management actions can be implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 270
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, SOIL MOISTURE SOURCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, WETLAND EVALUATION T
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WRPDE4 US ARM ENG WA
[4]  
AUROUSSEAU P, 1995, ROLE ENV IDENTIFICAT, P75
[5]   Interaction between farming systems, riparian zones, and landscape patterns: a case study in western France [J].
Baudry, J ;
Thenail, C .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 67 (1-4) :121-129
[6]   Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? [J].
Baudry, J ;
Burel, F ;
Aviron, S ;
Martin, M ;
Ouin, A ;
Pain, G ;
Thenail, C .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2003, 18 (03) :303-314
[7]   A hydrological model dedicated to topography-based simulation of nitrogen transfer and transformation: rationale and application to the geomorphology-denitrification relationship [J].
Beaujouan, V ;
Durand, P ;
Ruiz, L ;
Aurousseau, P ;
Cotteret, G .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :493-507
[8]  
BEAUJOUAN V, 2001, MODELISATION TRANSFE
[9]  
Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROL SCI B, V24, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834, 10.1080/02626667909491834]
[10]  
Beven K. J., 1986, SCALE PROBLEMS HYDRO, P107, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6